Publication:
Outcome and Predictors for 2-Year Visual Acuity in Eyes With Diabetic Macular Edema Treated With Ranibizumab

dc.authorscopusid54401920900
dc.authorscopusid56378253000
dc.authorscopusid6602733678
dc.contributor.authorYücel, O.
dc.contributor.authorBirinci, H.
dc.contributor.authorSüllü, Y.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T12:27:25Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T12:27:25Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Yücel] Özlem Eşki, Department of Ophthalmology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Birinci] Hakki, Department of Ophthalmology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Süllü] Ýüksel, Department of Ophthalmology, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To determine the role of baseline characteristics in predicting visual outcome in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with ranibizumab. Methods: A review was carried out of the charts of 97 eyes that received pro re nata (PRN) intravitreal ranibizumab (IR) 0.5 mg treatment for DME. The change in the mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was analyzed. The baseline demographics and ocular and optic coherence tomography findings were analyzed to determine the association with the 2-year visual acuity (VA). Results: BCVA increased from 0.54 ± 0.2 (0.05-1.0) to 0.41 ± 0.3 (0.0-1.0) log of the minimum angle of resolution (P < 0.001). Age (P = 0.012), gender (P = 0.018), baseline BCVA (P < 0.001), presence of leaking microaneurysms (MA) (P = 0.018), development of vitreomacular traction (VMT) (P = 0.001), development of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) (P = 0.040), and disruption of ellipsoid zone (EZ) (P = 0.007) were found as predictors of 2-year VA. There was no association between visual outcome and the other characteristics. Conclusions: PRN treatment of IR provides significant benefits in VA gain and anatomic improvement in eyes with DME. Older age, female sex, lower baseline VA, VMT development, and EZ disruption are predictors for the poor final VA. Development of PVD and leaking MA are predictors for the good final VA. © 2019 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/jop.2018.0082
dc.identifier.endpage234en_US
dc.identifier.issn1080-7683
dc.identifier.issn1557-7732
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid30896316
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85065608828
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage229en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2018.0082
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000462030000001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert Inc. info@liebertpub.comen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeuticsen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeuticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAntivascular Endothelial Growth Factoren_US
dc.subjectDiabetic Macular Edemaen_US
dc.subjectMacular Edemaen_US
dc.subjectOptical Coherence Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectPrognostic Factorsen_US
dc.subjectRanibizumaben_US
dc.titleOutcome and Predictors for 2-Year Visual Acuity in Eyes With Diabetic Macular Edema Treated With Ranibizumaben_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files