Publication:
Unsuccessful Probing and Nasolacrimal Canal Agenesis in Congenital Epiphora

dc.authorscopusid57078539400
dc.authorscopusid8540670800
dc.authorscopusid14720110800
dc.authorscopusid23093729400
dc.authorscopusid7005906397
dc.authorwosidÇoban, Deniz/Abd-7768-2020
dc.contributor.authorCoban, Deniz Turgut
dc.contributor.authorBeden, Umit
dc.contributor.authorSonmez, Baris
dc.contributor.authorElmali, Muzaffer
dc.contributor.authorErkan, Dilek
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T09:27:27Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T09:27:27Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Coban, Deniz Turgut] Gazi Hosp, Ophthalmol Dept, Samsun, Turkey; [Beden, Umit; Sonmez, Baris; Erkan, Dilek] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Med Sch, Ophthalmol Dept, Samsun, Turkey; [Elmali, Muzaffer] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Med Sch, Radiol Dept, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To present 3 cases with nasolacrimal canal agenesis who underwent repetitive unsuccessful probing for treatment of congenital epiphora. Materials and methods: Three patients who had undergone topical antibiotic therapy, lacrimal sac massage and repetitive probing in Ondokuz Mayis University, Medical School, Ophthalmology Department between June 2006 and March 2007 were included in the study. Thin-section computerized tomography (CT) scan was performed in all cases since nasolacrimal duct could not be detected during repetitive probing. Results: Among the patients 2 were males and 1 was a female. They were within the age range 5-7. Since it was not possible to cannulate the nasolacrimal canal during probing, CT scans were performed and nasolacrimal duct agenesis was detected in 3 patients. One of the patients had additional upper punctum agenesis, who also had no right frontal sinus and left sphenoid sinus. All tomographic images revealed a rudimentary upper nasolacrimal canal ending blindly and a lower canal leading into the maxillary sinus, which was very typical for the duct agenesis. In all patients, lacrimal fossas were shallow and irregular. Conclusion: Nasolacrimal duct agenesis should be considered in patients with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction and unsuccessful repetitive probing, especially if it is difficult to cannulate nasolacrimal canal during probing. Although assessing whether dacryocystorhinostomy is in favor of the patient, the lacrimal sac and fossa should be examined with imaging in details.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexEmerging Sources Citation Index
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/01676830.2010.522298
dc.identifier.endpage366en_US
dc.identifier.issn0167-6830
dc.identifier.issn1744-5108
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21158581
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-78650327476
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage363en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3109/01676830.2010.522298
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/4059
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000415509000016
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOrbit-The International Journal on Orbital Disorders-Oculoplastic and Lacrimal Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.journalOrbiten_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectNasolacrimal Canal Agenesisen_US
dc.subjectCongenital Epiphoraen_US
dc.subjectProbingen_US
dc.titleUnsuccessful Probing and Nasolacrimal Canal Agenesis in Congenital Epiphoraen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files