Publication:
Analyses of Turbidity and Acoustic Backscatter Signal With Artificial Neural Network for Estimation of Suspended Sediment Concentration

dc.authorwosidDoğan Demi̇r, Azize/Abh-2497-2021
dc.authorwosidCemek, Bilal/Aaz-7757-2020
dc.contributor.authorMeral, R.
dc.contributor.authorDogan Demir, A.
dc.contributor.authorCemek, B.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T09:04:35Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T09:04:35Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Meral, R.; Dogan Demir, A.] Bingol Univ, Biosyst Engn, Bingol, Turkey; [Cemek, B.] 19 May Univ, Dept Agr Struct & Irrigat, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe commonly used sampling method is restrictive for the spatial and temporal measurement of suspended sediment and requires intensive labor. These limitations and technological advances have led to methods based on sound or light scattering in water. In this study, the turbidity and acoustic backscattering signal (ABS) values were used with the aim of improving these methods with different artificial neural network (ANN) models; Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Radial Basis Neural networks (RBNN) and General Regression Neural Network (GRNN). Measurements were taken in a vertical sediment tower for two different sediment sizes (< 50 mu m and 50-100 mu m) and concentrations (0.0-6.0 g L-1). In the results of the regression analyses, turbidity values had strong relationships with sediment concentration for both sediment size groups (R-2 = 0.937 and 0.967). Although the ABS values had a reasonable R-2 value (0.873) for the 50-100 mu m group, the < 50 mu m group did not produce a significant R-2 value with regression analyses. The remarkable differences were not observed among MLP, RBNN and GRNN model for this sediment size group, and the reasonable R-2 and RMSE results were not produced with any ANN model that had a single ABS input for the < 50 mu m sediment group. On the other hand, for the other sediment group (50-100 mu m), ABS values were used as a single input, and the highest R-2 (0.917) value was obtained with MLP model and it was improved with the turbidity input (up to R-2 = 0.999). The results show that the ANN model could be considered as an alternative method because it was applied successfully to estimate suspended sediment concentration using with turbidity and ABS under different particle size conditions.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific & Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFinancial support was provided by The Scientific & Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) for this study.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.doi10.15666/aeer/1601_697708
dc.identifier.endpage708en_US
dc.identifier.issn1589-1623
dc.identifier.issn1785-0037
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage697en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1601_697708
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000424382600046
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCorvinus University Budapesten_US
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Ecology and Environmental Researchen_US
dc.relation.journalApplied Ecology and Environmental Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmentalen_US
dc.subjectWater Qualityen_US
dc.subjectSediment Transporten_US
dc.subjectAcoustic Algorithmen_US
dc.subjectParticle Sizeen_US
dc.titleAnalyses of Turbidity and Acoustic Backscatter Signal With Artificial Neural Network for Estimation of Suspended Sediment Concentrationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files