Publication:
Bond Strength of Total-Etch Dentin Adhesive Systems on Peripheral and Central Dentinal Tissue: A Microtensile Bond Strength Test

dc.authorscopusid13406980700
dc.authorscopusid13406273200
dc.contributor.authorYeşilyurt, C.
dc.contributor.authorBulucu, B.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T09:23:15Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T09:23:15Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Yeşilyurt] Cemal, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Trabzon, Turkey; [Bulucu] Bilinç, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μ TBS) of four total-etch adhesives [Excite (EB), Prime & Bond NT (PBNT), Single Bond (SB), and One Coat Bond (OCB)] by comparing them to five self-etching adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB), Xeno III (X III), Prompt L-Pop (PLP), AQ Bond (AQB), and Tyrian/One Step plus (TOSP)] at different dentinal areas. In addition the interface between the adhesive resins and dentin was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Methods and Materials: Superficial occlusal dentin of extracted human molars was exposed and finished with wet 800-grit silicon carbide paper. A block of composite resin was then bonded to the molar samples with the above adhesives according to the manufacturers' instructions. After 24 hours in water at 37°C, the specimens were sectioned into 1 mm thick slices and divided into two regional subgroups according to their relationship to pulp tissue using visual criteria: pulp center and pulp periphery. The slices were then trimmed for the microtensile bond test and subjected to a tensile force and crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Two-way analysis of variance was performed for statistical analyses. In addition the bond strengths for nine adhesive systems for each dentinal area were compared using the Post-Hoc test. The resin-dentin interfaces for each adhesive system were observed under a SEM. Results: Mean μ TBS ranged from (25.2 MPa) for TOSP to (48.9 MPa) for PBNT. The bond strengths of total-etch adhesive systems were not significantly different, and were higher than self-etch adhesive systems, except for CSEB (p<0.05). No significant regional difference was observed for all of the nine adhesive systems (p>0.05). SEM observation showed there is not a standard hybridization for adhesive systems. Conclusion: Different dentinal areas may not exhibit as great an influence on bond strengths using new adhesive systems.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage14en_US
dc.identifier.issn1526-3711
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid16685292
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33646438819
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Contemporary Dental Practiceen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Contemporary Dental Practiceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAdhesive Systemsen_US
dc.subjectDentin Areaen_US
dc.subjectMicrotensile Testen_US
dc.titleBond Strength of Total-Etch Dentin Adhesive Systems on Peripheral and Central Dentinal Tissue: A Microtensile Bond Strength Testen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files