Publication:
Auto-Rim Flap Technique for Lateral Crura Caudal Excess Treatment

dc.authorscopusid35966516100
dc.authorscopusid37036163400
dc.authorscopusid57217996872
dc.authorscopusid56488019100
dc.contributor.authorÇakir, B.
dc.contributor.authorKüçüker, İ.
dc.contributor.authorAksakal, İA.
dc.contributor.authorSağır, H.Ö.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:27:56Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:27:56Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Çakir] Bariş, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Küçüker] Ismail, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Aksakal] İbrahim Alper, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Sağır] Hacı Ömer, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: There are many variables that influence nose tip harmony. Even in a rhinoplasty that appears successful in profile, one may see nostril asymmetries, alar retractions, or irregularities in the soft triangle, and patients express their dissatisfaction with these simple deformities.OBJECTIVES: In this study, we define the ratio of caudal and cephalic excess of the lower lateral cartilage. We evaluate whether it is possible to eliminate nostril asymmetries and alar retractions by means of supporting the facet polygon with the help of a lower lateral cartilage auto-rim flap, a technique we have developed in our rhinoplasties.METHODS: The auto-rim flap was used successively on 498 primary rhinoplasty patients on whom the same surgeon operated between May 2013 and June 2015, performing marginal incisions.RESULTS: Of the 498 patients in the series, only 1 of the first 10 required a revision due to tip asymmetry related to the auto-rim flap. A minimal nostril asymmetry that did not require intervention occurred in 10 patients. In none of the patients could an increased alar retraction be seen postoperatively. All patients exhibited alar cartilage in the anatomically correct position.CONCLUSIONS: With the auto-rim flap technique, a part of the caudal excess of the alar cartilage remains as a flap in the facet region; therefore, there is no need in the cephalic region to perform more of an excision than what is strictly necessary.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Therapeutic. © 2016 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc. Reprints and permission: journals.permissions@oup.com.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/asj/sjw145
dc.identifier.endpage32en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27694454
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85014112128
dc.identifier.startpage24en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw145
dc.identifier.volume37en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000397035000010
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford Univ Press Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAesthetic Surgery Journalen_US
dc.relation.journalAesthetic Surgery Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleAuto-Rim Flap Technique for Lateral Crura Caudal Excess Treatmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files