Publication:
Spatiotemporal Analysis of Shoreline Changes of the Kizilirmak Delta

dc.authorscopusid54412893200
dc.authorscopusid56968114800
dc.authorscopusid36929638900
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, D.
dc.contributor.authorBeyazit, I.
dc.contributor.authorKilic Gul, F.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:45:18Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:45:18Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Öztürk] Derya, Department of Geomatics Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Beyazit] Isik, Nebula Survey Mapping and Engineering Services Company, Istanbul, Turkey; [Kilic Gul] Fatmagul, Department of Geomatic Engineering, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Istanbul, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractOzturk, D.; Beyazit, I., and Kilic, F., 2015. Spatiotemporal analysis of shoreline changes of the Kizilirmak Delta. The detection of shoreline changes in coastal countries is critical for successful management and planning. Determining shoreline changes and investigating reasons behind uncontrolled changes ensure that the necessary precautions can be taken. This study focuses on determining temporal changes that have occurred on the shoreline of the Kizilirmak Delta, which is one of the most crucial wetlands protected by the Ramsar Convention in Turkey. Landsat-5 thematic mapper (TM) satellite images from 1987, 1998, 2002, 2007, and 2011 were used to determine temporal changes. The approach, which integrates band-ratioing and histogram-thresholding methods, was applied using the second, fourth, and fifth bands of the Landsat TM images. The shoreline change envelope (SCE), end point rate (EPR), and linear regression rate (LRR) methods were used to determine the shoreline changes. The SCE method detected a landward migration that occurred on the delta, where its maximum migration was 655.6 m between 1987 and 2011. During the same period, the maximum coastal change rate was estimated to be-27.4 m/y using the EPR method and-29.7 m/y using the LRR method. The maximum amount of erosion occurred near the river mouth. The results indicated that the dams built on the Kizilirmak River and close to the delta significantly affected these changes and that the spurs, which were built to prevent coastal erosion and provide partial protection, cannot fully prevent erosion. © 2015 Coastel Education and Research, Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-14-00159.1
dc.identifier.endpage1402en_US
dc.identifier.issn0749-0208
dc.identifier.issn1551-5036
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84942052819
dc.identifier.startpage1389en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-14-00159.1
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000364260600009
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCoastal Education Research Foundation Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Coastal Researchen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Coastal Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectChange Detectionen_US
dc.subjectCoastal Erosionen_US
dc.subjectEPRen_US
dc.subjectLRRen_US
dc.subjectSCEen_US
dc.titleSpatiotemporal Analysis of Shoreline Changes of the Kizilirmak Deltaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files