Publication:
Shear Bond Strength of Aged Composite Restorations Repaired with a Universal Injectable Composite

dc.contributor.authorGönülol, Nihan
dc.contributor.authorAlmasifar, Lena
dc.contributor.authorYenidünya, Özge Gizem
dc.contributor.authorMisilli, Tuğba
dc.contributor.authorKalyoncuoglu, Elıf
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T12:19:42Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T12:19:42Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-tempOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi,Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi,Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi,Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi,Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the shear bond strength of a universal injectable composite used in the repair of aged composites.Methods: A total of 100 disk-shaped specimens (8 mm×2 mm) were produced using five different composites (n=20) (Gradia Direct Posterior, Tetric N Ceram BulkFill, Filtek Z250, SonicFill and Filtek BulkFill Posterior). Specimens were polymerized using an LED light curing unit for 20 s and stored at 37ºC in distilled water for 3 weeks. Specimens were subdivided into two groups per composite for repair using either the same composite used for the specimen or G-aenial Universal Flo. Following acid-etching and silane application, a universal adhesive (G-Premio BOND) was applied and light-cured. The repair materials were placed on the bonded surfaces of the specimens and polymerized in silicone molds (2 mm×2 mm). After thermocycling to simulate aging, shear bond strength (SBS) was tested using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Failure modes were examined using a stereomicroscope at ×40 magnification.Results: No statistically significant differences were found among the tested composites repaired with their own substrates. How-ever, the SBS SonicFill and Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior groups had significantly lower bond strengths when repaired with G-aenial Universal Flo in comparison to repairs made with their own substrates (p<0.05).Conclusion: When repaired with their own substrates, reliable bond strengths were obtained for all the composites tested.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/EurJTher.2019.18056
dc.identifier.endpage278en_US
dc.identifier.issn2564-7784
dc.identifier.issn2564-7040
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage273en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid373235
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/EurJTher.2019.18056
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/en/yayin/detay/373235/shear-bond-strength-of-aged-composite-restorations-repaired-with-a-universal-injectable-composite
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000502635500008
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAvesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Therapeuticsen_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of Therapeuticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliğien_US
dc.titleShear Bond Strength of Aged Composite Restorations Repaired with a Universal Injectable Compositeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files