Publication:
Comparison of Error Performance of Discrete Wavelet Transform Based Cyclic Coding Method in Different Type Channels

dc.authorscopusid57188582201
dc.authorscopusid35791875600
dc.contributor.authorYıldız, D.
dc.contributor.authorKaragöl, S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:11:56Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:11:56Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Yıldız] Doǧan, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Karagöl] Serap, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractForward Error Correction (FEC) is a technique used to increase the reliability of data transferred over noisy communication channels and provides error control. In this technique, the data is now used for error checking before the data is transmitted. Cyclic Coding is one of the FEC techniques used for data coding and decoding in communication systems. Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) is also used extensively in digital signal processing applications. In the first part of this study, Cyclic Coding Method is used in order to transmit the audio data recorded in.wav format for 5 s in the MATLAB environment with the minimum error possible. As a modulation method, Binary Phase Shift Keying (BPSK) modulation is used. In the communication system created, two types of channels are used: Addition White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) and Rician fading channels. These channels are coded with Cyclic (7,4), Cyclic (15,7), Cyclic (17,8), and Cyclic (23,12) codes respectively. Then, the Mean Square Error (MSE) performances of these encodings are analyzed. In the second part of the study, it is investigated which wavelet family is suitable in the communication system which was designed to transmit sound with minimum error. Four wavelet transform families at different levels are applied to the audio signal for Cyclic (7,4), Cyclic (15,7), Cyclic (17,8) and Cyclic (23,12) coded channels and the transmission performances are compared. According to the results obtained in the simulations, the best results for both the DWT state and the non-DWT state and for both channel types are obtained for Cyclic (23,12). The codes longer than this code have not been used in this study due to their unacceptable disadvantages in computing costs and bandwidth. © 2018 IEEE.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ISMSIT.2018.8567294
dc.identifier.endpage542en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9781538641842
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85060783013
dc.identifier.startpage536en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1109/ISMSIT.2018.8567294
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000467794200100
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartof-- 2nd International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies, ISMSIT 2018 -- 2018-10-19 through 2018-10-21 -- Kizilcahamam, Ankara -- 143566en_US
dc.relation.journal2018 2Nd International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (Ismsit)en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAdditive White Gaussian Noiseen_US
dc.subjectChannel Codingen_US
dc.subjectCyclic Codesen_US
dc.subjectForward Error Correctingen_US
dc.subjectRician Fading Channelen_US
dc.subjectWavelet Transformen_US
dc.titleComparison of Error Performance of Discrete Wavelet Transform Based Cyclic Coding Method in Different Type Channelsen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files