Publication:
Mandibular Symphyseal Distraction Osteogenesis: Review of Three Techniques

dc.authorscopusid7006266302
dc.authorscopusid59748991100
dc.authorscopusid20733782300
dc.authorscopusid56231681800
dc.authorscopusid56248493700
dc.authorscopusid55922788800
dc.authorscopusid55922788800
dc.contributor.authorAlkan, A.
dc.contributor.authorÖzer, M.
dc.contributor.authorBaş, B.
dc.contributor.authorBayram, M.
dc.contributor.authorÇelebi, N.
dc.contributor.authorInal, S.
dc.contributor.authorÖzden, B.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:24:00Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:24:00Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Alkan] Alper, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Erciyes Üniversitesi, Kayseri, Kayseri, Turkey; [Özer] Mete, Department of Orthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Baş] Burcu, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Bayram] Mehmet, Department of Orthodontics, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Trabzon, Turkey; [Çelebi] Nükhet, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Inal] Samet, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Özden] Bora, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractMandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis (MSDO) is an alternative strategy to correct mandibular transverse deficiencies and dental crowding. Only a limited number of practitioners have reported their clinical experience and potential complications of this procedure to widen the mandible in a large case series. This study involved retrospective analysis of 40 patients who underwent mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis. Three different types of distractor were used to widen the mandible: tooth-borne in 21 patients, bone-borne in 5 patients and hybrid (both bone and tooth-borne) in 14 patients. The distraction amount ranged from 7 to 11 mm (mean 7.31 mm). While 39 patients underwent successful mandibular symphyseal distraction, there was one failure. Most of the complications were experienced in bone-borne distractors, such as breakage of the distractor rod, gingival recession, secondary infection and ptosis of the chin. In the light of these findings, it is suggested that a lingually placed tooth-borne hyrax appliance is more suitable and reliable than the other distraction devices. Further larger studies are needed in order to better evaluate the effectiveness of bone-borne or hybrid devices. © 2006 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijom.2006.11.005
dc.identifier.endpage117en_US
dc.identifier.issn0901-5027
dc.identifier.issn1399-0020
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid17223309
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33846584523
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage111en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2006.11.005
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000244591500002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstoneen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleMandibular Symphyseal Distraction Osteogenesis: Review of Three Techniquesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files