Publication:
Comparison of Proteinuria Diagnostic Methods in Pregnant Patients

dc.authorscopusid57403613300
dc.authorscopusid7801424377
dc.authorscopusid35070986800
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Ö.
dc.contributor.authorBolluk, G.
dc.contributor.authorÇoban, U.
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-11T01:51:38Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Ozdemir] Ozge, Department of Perinatal Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey; [Bolluk] Gökhan, Department of Perinatal Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey; [Çoban] Ulaş, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ondokuz Mayis University, Medical School, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to compare spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio and 24-hour urine methods in pregnant patients and to eval-uate the accuracy of spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio against the reference standard 24-hour urine method. Methods: This retrospective study included 399 pregnant patients diagnosed with proteinuria, gestational hypertension, or preeclampsia. Urinary protein concentrations were measured by spot dipstick urine analysis, spot urinary protein-to-creatinine, and 24-hour total pro-teinuria via 24-hour urine collection. The 24-hour total proteinuria measurement was accepted as the reference standard for diagnosis of proteinuria, and significant proteinuria was defined ≥300 mg of protein in the 24-hour urine collection. Results: According to the receiver operating characteristics analysis of the spot urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio measurements, the cut-off value of the protein-to-creatinine ratio method was ≥0.443 mg protein/mg creatinine, the area under the curve was 0.887, the sensitiv-ity was 77.14%, the specificity was 87.76%, and the accuracy was 84.96%. According to the receiver operating characteristics analysis of the 24-hour total proteinuria measurements, these values were >0.405 mg/day, 0.874, 82.86%, 84.64%, and 84.17%, respectively. No difference was observed between these two proteinuria methods regarding the receiver operating characteristics analysis (p=0.475). There was a strong and significant correlation between the spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio and the 24-hour total proteinuria (r=0.842, p<0.001). Conclusion: Our findings revealed that there was a strong and significant correlation between the spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio and the 24-hour total proteinuria, and it may be used as an alternative to the 24-hour total proteinuria. In addition, the spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio is noteworthy, especially in an emergency situation in pregnant women for whom the time is limited to make a rapid clinical decision. © 2023 Perinatal Medicine Foundation.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2399/prn.23.0311012
dc.identifier.endpage79en_US
dc.identifier.issn1305-3124
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85189000679
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage74en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1177118
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2399/prn.23.0311012
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/en/yayin/detay/1177118/comparison-of-proteinuria-diagnostic-methods-in-pregnant-patients
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/47051
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPerinatal Medicine Foundationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPerinatal Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDiagnosisen_US
dc.subjectPregnancyen_US
dc.subjectProteinuriaen_US
dc.subjectUrine Protein-to-Creatinine Ratioen_US
dc.titleComparison of Proteinuria Diagnostic Methods in Pregnant Patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files