Publication:
Incomplete Mobilization of the Maxilla Resulting in Failed Maxillary Distraction: A Case Report

dc.authorscopusid7006266302
dc.authorscopusid55922788800
dc.authorscopusid20733782300
dc.authorscopusid59748991100
dc.contributor.authorAlkan, A.
dc.contributor.authorInal, S.
dc.contributor.authorBaş, B.
dc.contributor.authorÖzer, M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:18:24Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:18:24Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Alkan] Alper, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Erciyes Üniversitesi, Kayseri, Kayseri, Turkey; [Inal] Samet, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Baş] Burcu, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Özer] Mete, Department of Orthodontics, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractMaxillary distraction osteogenesis has become an accepted alternative method in the treatment of patients with severe maxillary hypoplasia in craniofacial syndromes and cleft-related deformities. Insufficient distraction, undesirable soft tissue changes, and occurrence of defective distraction vectors are among the potential complications of intraoral maxillary distraction osteogenesis. A 2-stage procedure combining maxillary advancement by distraction technique with genioplasty and mandibular setback surgery was planned to correct jaw deformities in a 22-year-old patient with severe maxillary retrusion, mandibular prognathism, and excessive lower facial height. In the first stage, osteotomies were performed and maxilla was lightly mobilized after down-fracture. Distractors were placed to the maxilla intraorally. During activation period, the maxilla rotated in a clockwise direction, producing a discrepancy between the planned and the actual vectors. Complete distraction was unsatisfactory and the complication was due to surgical technique. This case report presents the failure of maxillary distraction due to incomplete mobilization of the maxilla. Treatment of the case was achieved by the conventional osteotomy techniques at final operation. The maxilla was successfully advanced to the desired position producing good occlusion and an improved facial profile. © 2007 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.07.002
dc.identifier.endpageE11en_US
dc.identifier.issn1079-2104
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid17942333
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-36148964451
dc.identifier.startpagee5en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.07.002
dc.identifier.volume104en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000251677300012
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMosby Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.journalOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleIncomplete Mobilization of the Maxilla Resulting in Failed Maxillary Distraction: A Case Reporten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files