Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDesteli E.E.
dc.contributor.authorİmren Y.
dc.contributor.authorErdoğan M.
dc.contributor.authorSarısoy G.
dc.contributor.authorCoşgun S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T09:37:28Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T09:37:28Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn1863-9933
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0418-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/4752
dc.description.abstractBackground: Amputation of limb is essential in certain conditions; however, it may have significant impact on the patient’s psychological condition. The present study investigates psychological responses of upper limb (UL) amputees versus lower limb (LL) amputees regarding prosthetic adjustment, social discomfort, depression, and body image anxiety.Level of evidence: Epidemiologic and prognostic study, level III.Methods: Traumatic major amputations of 20 upper and 38 lower extremities of 58 patients who were currently using prosthesis were included. 12 of UL amputations were of dominantly used limb. Seven of the UL amputations, and nine of the LL amputations were female. The Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales was used for adjustment, restriction, and satisfaction. Anxiety and depression levels were assessed using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Body image disturbance and social discomfort were assessed with Amputation Body Image Scale-Revised (ABIS-R) and Social Discomfort Score, respectively.Results: 58 individuals with 20 UL and 38 LL amputations were included. Mean age of UL amputees was 44.76 ± 12.26 and 49.1 ± 14.3 years for LL amputees. Mean time of daily prosthesis use was 11.35 ± 4.8 and 11.52 ± 4.7 h, respectively. Mean time since amputation was 35.4 ± 14.3 and 36.05 ± 13.6 months; length of prosthesis use time was 24.8 ± 13.4 and 23.9 ± 15.12 months, respectively. Social adjustment and adjustment to limitation subscales had significantly higher scores in LL amputees (p < 0.001). There was statistically significant difference between mean HADS depression and anxiety scores (p < 0.001). Mean total ABIS-R score indicated significantly greater body image disturbance for UL amputees (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Well-adjusted LL prosthesis probably has better cosmetic appearance compared to that of UL prosthesis and perception of cosmetic appearance may be the key factor that leads to increased levels of body image anxiety and social discomfort. © 2014, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUrban und Vogel GmbHen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s00068-014-0418-3en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAmputeeen_US
dc.subjectLower limben_US
dc.subjectProsthesisen_US
dc.subjectPsychosocial adjustmenten_US
dc.subjectUpper limben_US
dc.titleComparison of upper limb amputees and lower limb amputees: a psychosocial perspectiveen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume40en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage735en_US
dc.identifier.endpage739en_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster