Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAydın, Mehmet Can
dc.contributor.authorZengin, Akile
dc.contributor.authorBağ, Yusuf Murat
dc.contributor.authorSümer, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorKayaalp, Cüneyt
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-30T19:51:47Z
dc.date.available2022-05-30T19:51:47Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationZENGİN A,BAĞ Y. M,AYDIN M. C,SÜMER F,KAYAALP C (2021). Unplanned laparoscopic peritoneal biopsy for gastric cancer. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, 28(2), 116 - 120. Doi: 10.14744/less.2021.90008.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2587-0610 / 2587-0610
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/less.2021.90008
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/33260
dc.descriptionTam Metin / Full Texten_US
dc.description.abstractIt is thought that the sensitivity of computed tomography (CT) in detecting peritoneal metas tases (PM) is low. In this study, we aimed to present our experience on gastric cancer (GC) patients with intraoperatively detected PM whose preoperative CT was normal in terms of distant metastasis. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the demographics and perioperative data of ten pa tients with gastric adenocarcinoma whose preoperative CT was normal in terms of PM, but intraoperatively PM was detected. Results: The mean age of the patients was 68.30±9.44 years. Six patients (60%) were male. Tumors were mostly localized in the distal 1/3 of the stomach (n=5, 50%). The median carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19.9 levels were 2.00 ng/ml (0.60–37.50) and 30.76 IU/ml (3.28–449.30), respectively. There were PM on the visceral peritoneum (small bowel mesentery) in two patients (20%) and on the parietal peritoneum in eight patients (80%). The operations were terminated in five patients (50%) when the PM de tected as they did not have any complications due to cancer. Laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy (n=2, 20%), laparoscopic tube gastrostomy (n=1, 10%), and laparoscopic gastroenterostomy (n=2, 20%) were performed on the patients with oral intake deficiency due to GC. Conclusion: Preoperative staging with CT before GC surgery is still valid. Multidetector CT scan should be preferred. However, it is still not enough for detecting all PM before surgery. Staging laparoscopy should be in mind, especially for patients with a high risk of PM.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKare Publishingen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.14744/less.2021.90008en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectadvanced gastric canceren_US
dc.subjectcomputed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectminimal invasiveen_US
dc.subjectperitonitis carcinomatosaen_US
dc.titleUnplanned laparoscopic peritoneal biopsy for gastric canceren_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-2379-1293en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorAydın, Mehmet Can
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage116en_US
dc.identifier.endpage120en_US
dc.relation.journalLaparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster