Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKeskin, M
dc.contributor.authorAkbas, H
dc.contributor.authorUysal, OA
dc.contributor.authorCanan, S
dc.contributor.authorAyyildiz, M
dc.contributor.authorAgar, E
dc.contributor.authorKaplan, S
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:39:23Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:39:23Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.issn0032-1052
dc.identifier.issn1529-4242
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000111596.61137.A1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/21510
dc.descriptionKaplan, Suleyman/0000-0003-1477-5002; AYYILDIZ, Mustafa/0000-0002-6594-3080; Canan, Sinan/0000-0002-9864-1767; Keskin, Mustafa/0000-0003-2066-7454en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000220618700008en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 15060349en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, the right sciatic nerves of 40 rats were used to determine whether a nerve graft within a vein graft might accelerate and facilitate axonal regeneration, compared with a nerve graft alone. The animals were separated into four groups, as follows: group 1, sham control; group 2 (control), segmental nerve resection and no repair; group 3, segmental nerve resection and nerve grafting; group 4, segmental nerve resection and reconstruction with a nerve graft within a vein conduit graft. For all groups, sciatic functional indices were calculated before the operation and on postoperative days 7 and 90. On postoperative day 90, the sciatic nerves were reexposed and nerve conduction velocities were recorded. The sciatic nerves were harvested from all groups for counting of the myelinated axons with a stereological method. No statistically significant differences with respect to return of gait function, axon count, or nerve conduction were noted between groups 3 and 4 (p > 0.05). However, functional recovery in group 4 on postoperative day 90 was significant, compared with group 2 (p < 0.05); the recovery difference between groups 2 and 3 was not significant (p > 0.05). This study was not able to demonstrate any functional benefits with the use of a nerve graft within a vein graft, compared with standard nerve grafting.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/01.PRS.0000111596.61137.A1en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleEnhancement of nerve regeneration and orientation across a gap with a nerve graft within a vein conduit graft: A functional, stereological, and electrophysiological studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume113en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1372en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1379en_US
dc.relation.journalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster