Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlkan, A.
dc.contributor.authorOezer, M.
dc.contributor.authorBas, B.
dc.contributor.authorBayram, M.
dc.contributor.authorCelebi, N.
dc.contributor.authorInai, S.
dc.contributor.authorOezden, B.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:24:00Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:24:00Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.issn0901-5027
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2006.11.005
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/20137
dc.descriptionKutuk, Nukhet/0000-0001-6563-1899; BAS, BURCU/0000-0003-0593-3400en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000244591500002en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 17223309en_US
dc.description.abstractMandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis (MSDO) is an alternative strategy to correct mandibular transverse deficiencies and dental crowding. Only a limited number of practitioners have reported their clinical experience and potential complications of this procedure to widen the mandible in a large case series. This study involved retrospective analysis of 40 patients who underwent mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis. Three different types of distractor were used to widen the mandible: tooth-borne in 21 patients, bone-borne in 5 patients and hybrid (both bone and tooth-borne) in 14 patients. The distraction amount ranged from 7 to 11 mm (mean 7.31 mm). While 39 patients underwent successful mandibular symphyseal distraction, there was one failure. Most of the complications were experienced in bone-borne distractors, such as breakage of the distractor rod, gingival recession, secondary infection and ptosis of the chin. In the light of these findings, it is suggested that a lingually placed tooth-borne hyrax appliance is more suitable and reliable than the other distraction devices. Further larger studies are needed in order to better evaluate the effectiveness of bone-borne or hybrid devices.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstoneen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.ijom.2006.11.005en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleMandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis: review of three techniquesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage111en_US
dc.identifier.endpage117en_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record