Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKeskin, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Christopher P.
dc.contributor.authorMoreira-Gonzalez, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorLobocki, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorYarim, Murat
dc.contributor.authorKaplan, Süleyman
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Ian T.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:13:24Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:13:24Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.issn0032-1052
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817d6206
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/19239
dc.descriptionKaplan, Suleyman/0000-0003-1477-5002; Keskin, Mustafa/0000-0003-2066-7454; /0000-0002-0636-4214en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000258136900009en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 18626355en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Small intestinal submucosa was evaluated as a bioscaffold candidate for periosteum-derived osteoblasts, and its suitability as a bone replacement material for cranial defects was investigated. Methods: In the in vitro phase, osteoblasts were expanded in osteogenic medium and were then seeded onto small intestinal submucosa. To confirm osteoblast phenotype, they were tested for alkaline phosphatase, collagen type 1, and calcium expression. In the in vivo phase, calvarial critical-sized defects were created in 35 rats. The defects were either left untreated for surgical control (group 1), treated with small intestinal submucosa alone (group 2), treated with an osteoblast-embedded construct (group 3), or treated with an autogenous bone graft (group 4). The results were evaluated 12 weeks after surgery with radiopacity measurements and with stereologic analysis. Results: Periosteal cells grew successfully in vitro. The percentage radiopaque area at the defect was measured to be 42, 74, 76, and 89 percent for groups 1, 2,3, and 4, respectively. The pixel intensity of the same site was 36.4, 48.1, 47.5, and 54.5 for the same groups, respectively. Tissue-engineered constructs did not achieve enough bone formation and calcification to be effective as autogenous bone grafts and were not superior to the small intestinal submucosa alone. However, both small intestinal submucosa and cell-seeded small intestinal submucosa mucosa showed significantly more bone formation compared with the untreated group. Conclusions: Although it was demonstrated that the small intestinal submucosa itself has osteogenic properties, it was not significantly increased by adding periosteum-derived osteoblasts to it. The osteogenic properties of small intestinal submucosa are promising, and its role as a scaffold should be investigated further.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817d6206en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleRepairing critical-sized rat calvarial defects with a periosteal cell-seeded small intestinal submucosal layeren_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume122en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage400en_US
dc.identifier.endpage409en_US
dc.relation.journalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster