Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorElaldi, Nazif
dc.contributor.authorBodur, Hurrem
dc.contributor.authorAscioglu, Sibel
dc.contributor.authorCelikbas, Aysel
dc.contributor.authorOzkurt, Zulal
dc.contributor.authorVahaboglu, Haluk
dc.contributor.authorUzun, Ramazan
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:07:02Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:07:02Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn0163-4453
dc.identifier.issn1532-2742
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2009.01.014
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/18755
dc.descriptionLeblebicioglu, Hakan/0000-0002-6033-8543; Ascioglu, Sibel/0000-0002-6052-029X; VAHABOGLU, Haluk/0000-0001-8217-1767; Elaldi, Nazif/0000-0002-9515-770X; dokmetas, ilyas/0000-0003-3523-3923en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000264945300010en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 19246100en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of oral ribavirin treatment in patients with Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF). Methods: In 2004, all patients diagnosed with CCHF were treated with oral ribavirin, however in 2003 none of the CCHF patients had been given treatment due to Lack of confirmatory diagnostic information at that time in Turkey. In this study, patients treated with ribavirin in 2004 (n = 126) were compared with ribavirin-untreated CCHF patients (n = 92) in 2003. Patients only with a definitive diagnosis of CCHF (clinical symptoms plus the presence of specific IgM antibodies against CCHF virus and presence of viral antigen) were included in this study. Results: There was no difference in the case-fatality rate between treated and untreated patients (7.1% vs. 11.9%; P > 0.05). A Cox Proportional Hazards regression analysis revealed that altered sensorium and prolonged international normalized ratio were independent predictors of mortality. Conclusion: Our results showed that oral ribavirin treatment did not improve the survival rate in CCHF patients. Ribavirin and supportive care are the only available choices for treatment of CCHF patients, but to ascertain the efficacy of ribavirin, more laboratory and observational studies are necessary and ultimately, to elucidate these conflicting results and evaluate the efficacy undoubtedly, a multicenter randomised controlled trial will be needed. (C) 2009 The British Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTurkish Ministry of HealthMinistry of Health - Turkeyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWe would like to thank our colleagues from the Turkish Ministry of Health for their contributions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherW B Saunders Co Ltden_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jinf.2009.01.014en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCrimean-Congo haemorrhagic feveren_US
dc.subjectOral ribavirin treatmenten_US
dc.subjectCase-fatality rateen_US
dc.titleEfficacy of oral ribavirin treatment in Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever: A quasi-experimental study from Turkeyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume58en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage238en_US
dc.identifier.endpage244en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Infectionen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster