Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSarikaya, Isil
dc.contributor.authorGuler, Ahmet Umut
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:53:10Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:53:10Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn1678-7757
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000100004
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/18210
dc.descriptionWOS: 000276524900003en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 20379676en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of dental porcelains. Material and Methods: Fifty-five cylindirical specimens (15x2 mm) were prepared for each feldspathic (Vita VMK 95, Ceramco III) and low-fusing dental porcelain (Matchmaker). Fifty-five specimens of machinable feldspathic porcelain blocks (Vitablocs Mark II), (12x14x18 mm) were cut into 2-mm-thick slices (12x14 mm) with low speed saw. The prepared specimens were divided into 11 groups (n=5) representing different polishing techniques including control ((C) no surface treatment), glaze (G) and other 9 groups that were finished and polished with polishing discs (Sof-Lex) (Sl), two porcelain polishing kits (NTI (Pk), Dialite II (Di)), a diamond polishing paste (Sparkle) (Sp), a zirconium silicate based cleaning and polishing prophy paste (Zircate) (Zr), an aluminum oxide polishing paste (Prisma Gloss) (Pg), and combinations of them. The surface roughness of all groups was measured with a profilometer. The data were analyzed with a 2-way analysis of variance, and the mean values were compared by the Tukey Honestly Significant Difference test (alpha=0.05). Results: For all porcelain material groups, the lowest Ra values were observed in Group Gl, Group Sl, Group Pk, and Group Di, which were not significantly different from each other (p>0.05). When comparing the 4 different porcelain materials, the machinable feldspathic porcelain block group (Mark II) demonstrated statistically significantly less Ra values than the other porcelain materials tested (p<0.05). No significant difference was observed between the VMK 95 and Ceramco III porcelain groups (p=0.919), also these groups demonstrated the highest Ra values. Conclusion. Subjected to surface roughness, the surfaces obtained with polishing and/or cleaning-prophy paste materials used alone were rougher compared to the surfaces finished using Sof-lex, Dialite, and NTI polishing kit. Polishing kits and discs were found more effective than the polishing pastes used alone or combined use with Sof-lex discs, thus improving surface smoothness.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUniv Sao Paulo Fac Odontologia Bauruen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1590/S1678-77572010000100004en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDental porcelainen_US
dc.subjectPolishing techniquesen_US
dc.subjectSurface roughnessen_US
dc.titleEffects of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of dental porcelainsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume18en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage10en_US
dc.identifier.endpage16en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Applied Oral Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster