Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDemirtas, Yener
dc.contributor.authorYagmur, Caglayan
dc.contributor.authorKelahmetoglu, Osman
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorGuneren, Ethem
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:48:31Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:48:31Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181d7a3cc
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/17945
dc.descriptionGuneren, Ethem/0000-0002-5981-7010; Demir, Ahmet/0000-0002-8820-3122en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000278102200030en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 20485045en_US
dc.description.abstractFree-tissue transfer is the reconstruction of choice for most head and neck defects. However, pedicled flaps are also used, especially in high-risk patients and after failure of a free flap. The aim of this study was to compare transaxillary-subclavian pedicled latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous (PLDMC) flap, pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap, and free-tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction in American Society of Anesthesiologists grades II and III patients. During the last 4 years, PLDMC flap with a modified transaxillary-subclavian route for transfer to the neck was used in 8 patients, pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap was used in 7 patients, and free flaps were used in 12 patients for head and neck reconstructions. These 3 methods were compared regarding the flap dimensions, complications, flap outcome scores, hospitalization time, and cost of the treatment. Mean age of the patients, mean American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, mean dimensions of the flaps, and mean hospitalization time did not differ significantly among the 3 groups. Regarding the operation time, flap complications, outcomes, and cost of total treatment, although statistically not significant, PLDMC group offered the fastest reconstruction with highest flap outcome scores and minimum cost. Free-tissue transfer is the procedure of choice especially for functional reconstruction of head and neck region. Occasionally, there exist cases in whom a pedicled flap could offer a safer option. The PLDMC flap transferred via the transaxillary-subclavian route may be preferred than, with advantages including increased arc of rotation, safer pedicle location, shorter duration of the procedure, and reduced complication rates and costs.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181d7a3ccen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectHead and neck reconstructionen_US
dc.subjectpedicled latissimus dorsi flapen_US
dc.subjectmusculocutaneous flapen_US
dc.subjectpectoralis major flapen_US
dc.titleTransaxillary-Subclavian Transfer of Pedicled Latissimus Dorsi Musculocutaneous Flap to Head and Neck Regionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage771en_US
dc.identifier.endpage775en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Craniofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster