Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSarikaya, Isil
dc.contributor.authorGuler, Ahmet Umut
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:40:08Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:40:08Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn1991-7902
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2011.03.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/17185
dc.descriptionWOS: 000292225900001en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground/purpose: There is a lack of information in the few studies reporting on the stainability of dental porcelain materials. However no studies have been found that investigated effects of polishing methods and staining agents on the color stability of dental porcelains. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different polishing techniques on the color stability of various dental porcelains. Materials and methods: Fifty-five specimens were prepared for each of feldspathic (Vita VMK 95, Ceramco III), low-fusing porcelain (Matchmaker), and machinable feldspathic porcelain blocks (Vitablocs Mark II). The prepared specimens were divided into 11 groups (n = 5) representing different polishing techniques including a control (no surface treatment), glaze, and nine other groups which were finished and polished with a polishing disc (Sof-Lex), two porcelain polishing kits (Nil, Dia lite II), a diamond polishing paste (Sparkle), a zirconium silicate-based cleaning and polishing prophy paste (Zircate), an aluminum oxide polishing paste (Prisma Gloss), and combinations of these. Specimens were stored for 48 hours at 37 degrees C in a coffee solution. The color of all specimens was measured with a colorimeter before and after exposure, and color changes (Delta E) were calculated. Data were analyzed with a two-way analysis of variance, and mean values were compared by the Tukey's honest significant difference test (alpha = 0.05). Results: When comparing the four different porcelain materials, Ceramco III demonstrated the highest Delta E value. No significant difference was observed among the porcelain material groups of Mark II, Matchmaker MC, and VMK 95 (P = 0.074). When comparing the polishing techniques, the lowest SE values were observed in Group GI for all porcelain materials tested. No significant difference was observed among Groups Sl, Di, and Pk, (P = 0.883), and these Groups demonstrated significantly higher Delta E values than Group GI (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the results suggest that feldspathic and low-fusing porcelain specimens were found to be more color-stable for glazed specimens versus polished specimens regardless of whether they were stained with the coffee solution. Glazed and polished specimens with different polishing materials demonstrated that the Delta E values were at an acceptable level for all of the porcelain materials tested (1 < Delta E < 3.7). Copyright (C) 2011, Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Taiwanen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jds.2011.03.001en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectcolor stabilityen_US
dc.subjectdental porcelainen_US
dc.subjectpolishing techniquesen_US
dc.titleEffects of different surface treatments on the color stability of various dental porcelainsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage65en_US
dc.identifier.endpage71en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Dental Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster