Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHo, Caroline
dc.contributor.authorTurk, Tamer
dc.contributor.authorElekdag-Turk, Selma
dc.contributor.authorJones, Allan S.
dc.contributor.authorPetocz, Peter
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Lam L.
dc.contributor.authorDarendeliler, M. Ali
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:39:54Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:39:54Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406
dc.identifier.issn1097-6752
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.034
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/17129
dc.descriptionElekdag-Turk, Selma/0000-0002-2799-6501; Darendeliler, Mehmet Ali/0000-0002-8906-8153en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000292304100007en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 21724071en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Previous studies have used the right and left sides of the same jaw to compare different force levels, types of movement, and durations of forces. However, the amounts of root resorption have not been compared between the right and left sides after applying the same amount of force. The aims of the study were to quantitatively compare the volumes of the root resorption lacunae between the right and left first premolars to determine whether 1 side can serve as a control to the other and to compare the volumes of root resorption lacunae of the first premolars between the maxilla and the mandible. Methods: Forty-four first premolars, orthodontically indicated for extraction from 11 patients (left and right maxillary and mandibular first premolars from each) were moved buccally by using beta-titanium-molybdenum alloy 0.017 X 0.025-in cantilever springs with continuous heavy (225 g) force. After the experimental period, the teeth were extracted under a strict protocol to prevent root cementum damage and then analyzed by using a microcomputed tomography scan x-ray system (1172; SkyScan, Aartselaar, Belgium) and specially designed software (Convex Hull 2D, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia) for direct volumetric measurements. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the mean cube root volumes of root resorption craters between the right and left sides (P = 0.18) or between the maxillary and mandibular jaws (P = 0.10). There was also no statistical significance for the interception (P = 0.41), which indicated that the jaw and the side had independent effects. Conclusions: The amount of root resorption on the left and right sides of the jaw were similar in both the maxilla and the mandible. Therefore, for future root resorption studies, it is justifiable to use the split-mouth technique so that teeth from 1 side of the jaw can serve as the controls. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:e49-e52)en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMosby-Elsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.034en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titlePhysical properties of root cementum: Part 19. Comparison of the amounts of root resorption between the right and left first premolars after application of buccally directed heavy orthodontic tipping forcesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume140en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpageE49en_US
dc.identifier.endpageE52en_US
dc.relation.journalAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedicsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record