Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorYesildag, Osman
dc.contributor.authorKoprulu, Diyar
dc.contributor.authorYuksel, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorSoylu, Korhan
dc.contributor.authorOzben, Beste
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:39:53Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:39:53Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn0742-2822
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8175.2011.01393.x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/17123
dc.descriptionYuksel, Serkan/0000-0001-9501-4568; Ozben, Beste/0000-0002-3484-6392en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000292887100014en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 21718351en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The ratio of early transmitral flow velocity to mitral annulus early diastolic velocity (E/Ea) is a widely used noninvasive tool to estimate left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP). The aim of this study was to explore whether E/Ea ratio was a reliable index for the estimation of LVEDP in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR). Methods: Sixteen patients with nonischemic MR (primary MR group; 6 male, 58 +/- 12 years) 51 patients with ischemic MR (secondary MR group; 29 male, 63 +/- 9 years) and 29 patients without MR (control group; 19 male, 53 +/- 10 years) were consecutively included. The peak transmitral flow and mitral annular velocities during early diastole were measured. LVEDP was determined invasively by left heart catheterization. Results: Primary and secondary MR groups had significantly higher E/Ea ratios and LVEDP than control group. LVEDP significantly correlated with E/Ea ratio in patients with primary MR, but not in patients with secondary MR. Multiple regression analysis revealed that E/Ea ratio was an independent predictor of LVEDP in patients with primary MR. Ten patients with primary MR had LVEDP >= 15 mmHg. ROC analysis demonstrated cutoff values for E/Ea ratios as > 10.5 for lateral mitral annulus (sensitivity: 80%, specificity: 66%, PPV: 80%, NPV: 66%) and as > 14 for medial mitral annulus (sensitivity: 90%, specificity: 83%, PPV: 90%, NPV: 83%) to predict primary MR patients with LVEDP >= 15 mmHg. Conclusion: E/Ea ratio is still reliable in estimation of LVEDP in primary MR patients while it is not predictive for LVEDP in secondary MR patients. (Echocardiography 2011;28:633-640)en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/j.1540-8175.2011.01393.xen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectechocardiographyen_US
dc.subjectleft heart catheterizationen_US
dc.subjectleft ventricular end-diastolic pressureen_US
dc.subjectmitral regurgitationen_US
dc.subjecttissue Doppler imagingen_US
dc.titleNoninvasive Assessment of Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure with Tissue Doppler Imaging in Patients with Mitral Regurgitationen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage633en_US
dc.identifier.endpage640en_US
dc.relation.journalEchocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniquesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster