dc.contributor.author | Yesildag, Osman | |
dc.contributor.author | Koprulu, Diyar | |
dc.contributor.author | Yuksel, Serkan | |
dc.contributor.author | Soylu, Korhan | |
dc.contributor.author | Ozben, Beste | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-21T14:39:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-21T14:39:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0742-2822 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8175.2011.01393.x | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/17123 | |
dc.description | Yuksel, Serkan/0000-0001-9501-4568; Ozben, Beste/0000-0002-3484-6392 | en_US |
dc.description | WOS: 000292887100014 | en_US |
dc.description | PubMed: 21718351 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The ratio of early transmitral flow velocity to mitral annulus early diastolic velocity (E/Ea) is a widely used noninvasive tool to estimate left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP). The aim of this study was to explore whether E/Ea ratio was a reliable index for the estimation of LVEDP in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR). Methods: Sixteen patients with nonischemic MR (primary MR group; 6 male, 58 +/- 12 years) 51 patients with ischemic MR (secondary MR group; 29 male, 63 +/- 9 years) and 29 patients without MR (control group; 19 male, 53 +/- 10 years) were consecutively included. The peak transmitral flow and mitral annular velocities during early diastole were measured. LVEDP was determined invasively by left heart catheterization. Results: Primary and secondary MR groups had significantly higher E/Ea ratios and LVEDP than control group. LVEDP significantly correlated with E/Ea ratio in patients with primary MR, but not in patients with secondary MR. Multiple regression analysis revealed that E/Ea ratio was an independent predictor of LVEDP in patients with primary MR. Ten patients with primary MR had LVEDP >= 15 mmHg. ROC analysis demonstrated cutoff values for E/Ea ratios as > 10.5 for lateral mitral annulus (sensitivity: 80%, specificity: 66%, PPV: 80%, NPV: 66%) and as > 14 for medial mitral annulus (sensitivity: 90%, specificity: 83%, PPV: 90%, NPV: 83%) to predict primary MR patients with LVEDP >= 15 mmHg. Conclusion: E/Ea ratio is still reliable in estimation of LVEDP in primary MR patients while it is not predictive for LVEDP in secondary MR patients. (Echocardiography 2011;28:633-640) | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2011.01393.x | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | echocardiography | en_US |
dc.subject | left heart catheterization | en_US |
dc.subject | left ventricular end-diastolic pressure | en_US |
dc.subject | mitral regurgitation | en_US |
dc.subject | tissue Doppler imaging | en_US |
dc.title | Noninvasive Assessment of Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure with Tissue Doppler Imaging in Patients with Mitral Regurgitation | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | OMÜ | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 28 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 633 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 640 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |