Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTander, Burak
dc.contributor.authorBicakci, Unal
dc.contributor.authorGunaydin, Mithat
dc.contributor.authorDemirel, Dilek
dc.contributor.authorRizalar, Riza
dc.contributor.authorAriturk, Ender
dc.contributor.authorBernay, Ferit
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:05:21Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:05:21Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1731-5530
dc.identifier.issn1897-4252
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2013.36132
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/15817
dc.descriptionWOS: 000323090000006en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The differences between single-port (SPT) and two-port techniques (TPT) for the debridement of advanced thoracic empyema in children were evaluated. Material and methods: Age, gender, physical findings, type of thoracoscopic intervention, the length of stay (LOS) and the duration of chest tube drainage (DCTD) were reviewed in 51 patients with thoracic empyema (33 M, 18 F). The SPT was used in 14 patients, while the TPT was used in 37 patients. In the SPT, the telescope itself was used as a dissecting tool. No other instrument was inserted during the debridement. In the TPT, the first port is made for the telescope and the second port for the surgical instrument. A chest tube is inserted through the port site. Results: The empyema was located in the right hemithorax in 24 patients and in the left hemithorax in 25 patients. Two patients suffered from bilateral involvement. The chest tube was removed after a median of 13 days in the SPT and 11 days in the TPT patients. The LOS was a median of 20 days and 13 days in patients from the SPT and TPT groups, respectively. A spontaneously resolved bronchopleural fistula was observed in 4 patients from the SPT group and 2 patients from the TPT group. No significant difference was found between the techniques in terms of age, gender, site of empyema, fever, or the development of bronchopleural fistula. Although the LOS and DCTD were shorter in patients treated with the TPT, the difference was not significant. Conclusions: Although not significant, the TPT for the debridement of advanced empyema in children seems to be more effective in terms of the LOS, DCTD and the risk of bronchopleural fistula.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTermedia Publishing House Ltden_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5114/kitp.2013.36132en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectempyemaen_US
dc.subjectsingle-port techniqueen_US
dc.subjecttwo-port techniqueen_US
dc.titleWhich technique is the best for the surgical management of empyema thoracis in children?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage130en_US
dc.identifier.endpage132en_US
dc.relation.journalKardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska-Polish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster