Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRam, Rapur
dc.contributor.authorSwarnalatha, Guditi
dc.contributor.authorAkpolat, Tekin
dc.contributor.authorDakshinamurty, Kalogotla Venkata
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:04:58Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:04:58Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn0301-1623
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-012-0311-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/15751
dc.descriptionWOS: 000322718000030en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 23143752en_US
dc.description.abstractThe aims of the present report were to document our experience of the prevalence of tuberculous peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients, mode of presentation, diagnosis and outcome and to discuss the current published data about catheter removal. A retrospective study of CAPD patients with tuberculous peritonitis was done. A minimum of three specimens of peritoneal fluid were examined for acid-fast bacilli smears. The BACTEC 9000 Blood Culture Series of instruments were used for the culture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. After 2005, patients were treated with anti-tuberculous treatment, and catheter retention was started in our patients. There were eleven patients (2.6 %) with tuberculous peritonitis among 414 CAPD patients. M. tuberculosis accounted for 4.47 % of all peritonitis episodes. The incidence of tuberculous peritonitis was 1/794 months. There were eight males and three females. The mean age was 49 years. Intestinal obstruction was reported in two patients, and two patients were treated for antecedent peritonitis. One of them had a simultaneous fungal peritonitis. One patient each developed a peritoneo-cutaneous fistula and ultrafiltration failure. Three were successfully treated without the removal of catheter. Based on the analysis of all published reports of tuberculous peritonitis, there was no significant difference in patient survival between patients in whom CAPD catheter was removed or retained. Tuberculous peritonitis should be considered in patients with neutrophilic 'sterile' peritonitis with no response to antibacterial medications, predominance of lymphocytic peritonitis and in bacterial peritonitis not responding to antibiotics. After an early diagnosis, with close monitoring, an effort to retain the catheter after 5 days of anti-tuberculous therapy may be attempted.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s11255-012-0311-0en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMycobacterium tuberculosisen_US
dc.subjectPeritonitisen_US
dc.subjectCAPDen_US
dc.titleMycobacterium tuberculous peritonitis in CAPD patients: a report of 11 patients and review of literatureen_US
dc.typereviewen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume45en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1129en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1135en_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Urology and Nephrologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record