Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorErdem, H.
dc.contributor.authorStahl, J. P.
dc.contributor.authorInan, A.
dc.contributor.authorKilic, S.
dc.contributor.authorAkova, M.
dc.contributor.authorRioux, C.
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, H.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:56:48Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:56:48Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn0934-9723
dc.identifier.issn1435-4373
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-014-2116-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/15020
dc.descriptionbalkan, ilker inanc/0000-0002-8977-5931; Elaldi, Nazif/0000-0002-9515-770X; AKOVA, MURAT/0000-0002-6904-9473; VAHABOGLU, Haluk/0000-0001-8217-1767; Hosoglu, Salih/0000-0002-4034-9202; KORTEN, VOLKAN/0000-0002-9991-814X; Stahl, Jean Paul/0000-0002-0086-3557en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000340538700017en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 24789652en_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to assess the infectious diseases (ID) wards of tertiary hospitals in France and Turkey for technical capacity, infection control, characteristics of patients, infections, infecting organisms, and therapeutic approaches. This cross-sectional study was carried out on a single day on one of the weekdays of June 17-21, 2013. Overall, 36 ID departments from Turkey (n = 21) and France (n = 15) were involved. On the study day, 273 patients were hospitalized in Turkish and 324 patients were followed in French ID departments. The numbers of patients and beds in the hospitals, and presence of an intensive care unit (ICU) room in the ID ward was not different in both France and Turkey. Bed occupancy in the ID ward, single rooms, and negative pressure rooms were significantly higher in France. The presence of a laboratory inside the ID ward was more common in Turkish ID wards. The configuration of infection control committees, and their qualifications and surveillance types were quite similar in both countries. Although differences existed based on epidemiology, the distribution of infections were uniform on both sides. In Turkey, anti-Gram-positive agents, carbapenems, and tigecycline, and in France, cephalosporins, penicillins, aminoglycosides, and metronidazole were more frequently preferred. Enteric Gram-negatives and hepatitis B and C were more frequent in Turkey, while human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and streptococci were more common in France (p < 0.05 for all significances). Various differences and similarities existed in France and Turkey in the ID wards. However, the current scene is that ID are managed with high standards in both countries.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s10096-014-2116-9en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleThe features of infectious diseases departments and anti-infective practices in France and Turkey: a cross-sectional studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1591en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1599en_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseasesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster