dc.contributor.author | Arici, Nurse | |
dc.contributor.author | Akdeniz, Berat Serdar | |
dc.contributor.author | Arici, Selim | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-21T13:51:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-21T13:51:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2234-7518 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2005-372X | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.1.29 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/14759 | |
dc.description | Arici, Selim/0000-0001-8890-2065 | en_US |
dc.description | WOS: 000348623800005 | en_US |
dc.description | PubMed: 25667915 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: The coefficients of friction (COFs) of aesthetic ceramic and stainless steel brackets used in conjunction with stainless steel archwires were investigated using a modified linear tribometer and special computer software, and the effects of the bracket slot size (0.018 inches [in] or 0.022 in) and materials (ceramic or metal) on the COF were determined. Methods: Four types of ceramic (one with a stainless steel slot) and one conventional stainless steel bracket were tested with two types of archwire sizes: a 0.017 x 0.025-in wire in the 0.018-in slots and a 0.019 x 0.025-in wire in the 0.022-in slot brackets. For pairwise comparisons between the 0.018-in and 0.022-in slot sizes in the same bracket, an independent sample t-test was used. One-way and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post-hoc test at the 95% confidence level (alpha = 0.05) were also used for statistical analyses. Results: There were significant differences between the 0.022-in and 0.018-in slot sizes for the same brand of bracket. ANOVA also showed that both slot size and bracket slot material had significant effects on COF values (p < 0.001). The ceramic bracket with a 0.022-in stainless steel slot showed the lowest mean COF (mu = 0.18), followed by the conventional stainless steel bracket with a 0.022-in slot (mu = 0.21). The monocrystalline alumina ceramic bracket with a 0.018-in slot had the highest COF (mu = 0.85). Conclusions: Brackets with stainless steel slots exhibit lower COFs than ceramic slot brackets. All brackets show lower COFs as the slot size increases. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Korean Assoc Orthodontists | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.4041/kjod.2015.45.1.29 | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Brackets | en_US |
dc.subject | Archwires | en_US |
dc.subject | Coefficient of friction | en_US |
dc.subject | Tribometer | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of the frictional characteristics of aesthetic orthodontic brackets measured using a modified in vitro technique | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | OMÜ | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 45 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 29 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 37 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Korean Journal of Orthodontics | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |