Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKaya, Cengiz
dc.contributor.authorSener, Elif Bengi
dc.contributor.authorKoksal, Ersin
dc.contributor.authorUstun, Yasemin Burcu
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Handan
dc.contributor.authorSahinoglu, Ali Haydar
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:51:46Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:51:46Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn0030-9982
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/14758
dc.descriptionWOS: 000347740200007en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 25831670en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the effects of intrauterine lidocaine, intrauterine lidocaine plus rectal diclofenac, and a placebo on analgesia and to determine the satisfaction of patients and surgeons in cases of endometrial biopsy. Methods: The double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey, from April 2013 to January 2014, and comprised patients scheduled for in-office endometrial biopsy. They were divided into three groups: Group P, 5ml of 0.9% saline intrauterine; Group L, 5ml of 2% lidocaine intrauterine; and Group LD, 5ml of 2% lidocaine intrauterine +/- 10min before the procedure plus 50mg of rectal diclofenac sodium. Haemodynamic changes and visual analogue scale scores were recorded during the preoperative period, when the cervix was grasped with a tenaculum, immediately after intrauterine instillation, during uterine curettage and at postoperative 10 min. The patient and the surgeon were questioned about their satisfaction 15 min after the procedure. SPSS 21 was used for statistical analysis. Results: The 90 patients in the study were divided into three equal groups of 30(33.33%) each. There were no statistically significant inter-group differences in age, bodyweight, parity, number of postmenopausal patients, haemodynamic parameters and American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (p>0.05 in all categories). In Group P, the visual analogue scale score estimated when the cervix was grasped with the tenaculum was lower when compared with Group L and Group LD (p=0.029 and p=0.007, respectively). At other measurement time points, the scores did not differ between the groups. The groups did not differ with respect to patient and surgeon satisfaction and complication rates (p>0.05). Conclusion: Intrauterine lidocaine or intrauterine lidocaine plus rectal diclofenac application had no effect on visual analogue scale scores, patient satisfaction and vasovagal reaction.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPakistan Medical Assocen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEndometriumen_US
dc.subjectBiopsyen_US
dc.subjectOffice Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectAnalgesiaen_US
dc.titleComparison of placebo and intrauterine lidocaine with/or without rectal diclofenac sodium suppositories used in office endometrial biopsyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume65en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage29en_US
dc.identifier.endpage34en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of the Pakistan Medical Associationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster