Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSafaz, Ismail
dc.contributor.authorKurt, Murat
dc.contributor.authorCakir, Gonul
dc.contributor.authorYasar, Evren
dc.contributor.authorAlaca, Ridvan
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:45:31Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:45:31Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn1017-7833
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5455/bcp.20150207075550
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/14105
dc.descriptionWOS: 000362920300005en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective:The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) is a widely used screening instrument in neuropsychological assessment. The present study aims to assess the reliability and practice effects of the Turkish version of the RBANS Form A in healthy persons. Methods: Data from 95 healthy volunteers (actively working and living in Ankara) were obtained. The subjects (48 M, 47 F) were between 20 and 49 years of age. The educational background of the subjects is characterized as follows: 33 subjects graduated from primary school (5-8 years), 33 from high school (9-11 years), and 29 from university (12+ years).Time period between test and retest ranged from 28 to 43 days. For the inter-rater reliability coefficient, 2 trained scorers blindly scored 51 random standardization samples for figure copy/recall subtests. Test-retest stability coefficients were assessed by Pearson correlation coefficient. Practice effect was assessed by paired t test and effect sizes. For internal consistency, Cronbach's a was calculated. Results: The test-retest coefficients ranged from 0.59 to 0.88 for the indices and from 0.45 to 0.93 for the subtests. Figure copy (p=0.90), picture naming (p=0.56), semantic fluency (p=0.36) subtests and visuospatial/constructional (p=0.42), language indices (p=0.19), and mean differences in change scores were minimal. For the other subtests and index scores, the differences between the tests were significant (p<0.05). Except for figure copy, picture naming, and semantic fluency subtests, all subtests and immediate memory, attention, delayed memory indices showed practice effects (effect size >0.10). Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the RBANS was 0.86. The figure copy and figure recall subtests' inter-rater reliability coefficients were 0.83 and 0.84, respectively (both p<0.001). Conclusions: The Turkish version of the RBANS (form A) showed adequate reliability, and it can be used as a short screening tool for neuropsychological performance.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKure Iletisim Grubu A Sen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5455/bcp.20150207075550en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectRBANSen_US
dc.subjectTurkishen_US
dc.subjectreliabilityen_US
dc.subjectpractice effectsen_US
dc.subjectneuropsychological assessmenten_US
dc.titleTest-retest Reliability and Practice Effects of the Turkish Version of Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) in Healthy Personsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage243en_US
dc.identifier.endpage247en_US
dc.relation.journalKlinik Psikofarmakoloji Bulteni-Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster