Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGunduz, Kaan
dc.contributor.authorAvsever, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorOrhan, Kaan
dc.contributor.authorCanitezer, Gozde
dc.contributor.authorAcikgoz, Aydan
dc.contributor.authorOz, Ulas
dc.contributor.authorMidilli, Muhammet
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:41:44Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:41:44Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn0587-3908
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/13985
dc.descriptionOz, Ulas/0000-0002-5203-577X; Orhan, Kaan/0000-0001-6768-0176; avsever, hakan/0000-0002-2972-2547en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000370310900005en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 26999887en_US
dc.description.abstractAim: The occurrence of multiple supernumerary teeth is rare and often found in association with syndromes such as cleidocranial dysplasia, Gardner's syndrome or cleft lip and palate. Few examples of non-syndromal multiple supernumerary teeth have been reported. The aim of this multi-centre study was to investigate the prevalence of supernumerary premolar teeth in non-syndromic patients and to investigate the association between the presence of supernumerary premolar teeth and malocclusion type in a Turkish population. Materials and methods: The clinical records and panoramic radiographs of 10,700 patients (referred to three different university hospitals) were retrospectively examined for the presence of supernumerary premolars. Age, gender, orthodontic malocclusion type, the number of supernumerary premolars (two or more), the distribution, location, position (vertical, horizontal, inverted, mesio-angular), surgical approach, and related complications (pain, cystic changes, root resorption, or eruption disturbance of adjacent teeth) were recorded. Results: Forty-two cases (13 Class I, 17 Class II, 12 Class III) of multiple mandibular supernumerary premolars in patients without an associated syndrome were detected. A total of 97 (27 Class I, 41 Class II, 29 Class III) supernumerary premolar teeth were found, with a prevalence of 0.39%. No statistical difference was found related to gender, malocclusion type and supernumerary premolars (p > 0.05). The majority of the extra premolars were located in the mandible, which was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The present study revealed that the prevalence of multiple supernumerary teeth was 0.39%. The most frequently impacted premolars were found in the mandible and more often associated with Class II malocclusions in the examined Turkish population.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAustralian Soc Orthodontists Incen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleA multi-centre evaluation of multiple supernumerary premolar prevalenceen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage149en_US
dc.identifier.endpage156en_US
dc.relation.journalAustralian Orthodontic Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster