| dc.contributor.author | Karaman, Emel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Guler, Eda | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-21T13:40:38Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-06-21T13:40:38Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0198-7569 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1945-3388 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2598 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/13841 | |
| dc.description | WOS: 000367256000017 | en_US |
| dc.description | PubMed: 26697560 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This study aimed to evaluate the microleakage of a new universal adhesive used in self-etch (Se) and etch-and-rinse (Er) mode compared with conventional adhesive systems. Fifty standard Class V caries lesions were prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of premolar teeth and randomly divided into five groups (n = 10): Group 1 (control), Adper Single Bond 2 (SB); Group 2, Single Bond Universal applied as Er (SBUEr); Group 3, Single Bond Universal applied as Se (SBUSe); Group 4 (control), Clearfil SE (CSE); and Group 5, Xeno V (XE). On both enamel and dentin, XE showed the highest microleakage scores, and SBU showed similar leakage with the control group. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Quintessence Publishing Co Inc | en_US |
| dc.relation.isversionof | 10.11607/prd.2598 | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
| dc.title | Marginal Adaptation of Class V Restorations with a New Universal Adhesive | en_US |
| dc.type | article | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | OMÜ | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 36 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 125 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 130 | en_US |
| dc.relation.journal | International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
