Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGunaydin, Mithat
dc.contributor.authorTander, Burak
dc.contributor.authorDemirel, Dilek
dc.contributor.authorCaltepe, Gonul
dc.contributor.authorKalayci, Ayhan Gazi
dc.contributor.authorEren, Esra
dc.contributor.authorBernay, Ferit
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:34:17Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:34:17Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0022-3468
dc.identifier.issn1531-5037
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.08.011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/13477
dc.descriptionWOS: 000372012800008en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 26382286en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is a cholestatic liver disease of childhood. Pruritus resulting from increased bile salts in serum might not respond to medical treatment, and internal or external biliary drainage methods have been described. In this study, we aimed to evaluate different internal drainage techniques in patients with PFIC. Patients and methods: Between 2009 and 2014, seven children (4 male, 3 female, 3 months-5 years old), (median 2 years of age) with PFIC were evaluated. The patients were reviewed according to age, gender, complaints, surgical technique, laboratory findings and outcome. In each two patients, cholecystoileocolonic anastomosis, cholecystojejunocolonic anastomosis and cholecystocolostomy were performed. Cholecysto-appendico-colonic anastomosis was the technique used in one patient. Results: Jaundice and excessive pruritus were the main complaints. One of the patients with cholecystoileocolonic anastomosis died of comorbid pathologies (cirrhosis, adhesive obstruction and severe sepsis). Temporary rectal bleeding was observed in all the patients postoperatively. Regardless of the surgical technique, pruritus was dramatically decreased in all the patients in the postoperative period. Conclusion: Regardless of the technique, internal biliary diversion methods are beneficial for the relief of pruritus in PFIC patients. Selection of the surgical method might vary depending on the surgeon's preference and the surgical anatomy of the gastrointestinal system of the patient. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherW B Saunders Co-Elsevier Incen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.08.011en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectProgressive familial intrahepatic cholestasisen_US
dc.subjectBiliary diversionen_US
dc.subjectInternal drainageen_US
dc.subjectPruritusen_US
dc.titleDifferent techniques for biliary diversion in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasisen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume51en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage386en_US
dc.identifier.endpage389en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Pediatric Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster