Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAksakal, Ibrahim Alper
dc.contributor.authorKucuker, Ismail
dc.contributor.authorOnger, Mehmet Emin
dc.contributor.authorEngin, Murat Sinan
dc.contributor.authorKeles, Musa Kemal
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:33:26Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:33:26Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0743-684X
dc.identifier.issn1098-8947
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1571807
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/13367
dc.descriptionKeles, Musa K/0000-0003-1915-079X; Demir, Ahmet/0000-0002-8820-3122en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000374509700003en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 26919381en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) is a substance abundant in green tea. In this study, the effects of EGCG on, perforator flap viability were investigated. Methods A total of 40 rats were assigned to four groups of 10 each. In each subject, a 4 x 6 cm abdominal skin flap was raised and adapted back onto its place. In the control group, no further procedures were taken. In the flap group, 40 mg/kg/d EGCG was injected into the flap. In the gavage group, 100 mg/kg/d EGCG was given through a feeding tube. In the intraperitoneal group, 50 mg/kg/d EGCG was injected intraperitoneally. On the 7th postoperative day, flaps were photographed and the viable areas were measured and compared via a one-way analysis of variance. Results The ratios of viable and contracted flap area were 9.15/12.01, 4.59/16.46, 11.56/11.20, and 11.65/10.77 cm(2) for the control, flap group, gavage group, and intraperitoneal group, respectively. While the flap group yielded the worst results in the sense of flap contraction and viability (p < 0.001), the gavage and intraperitoneal groups were significantly better than those of the control group (p = 0.03). Histologically, epidermal, papillary dermal, and capillary tissue volumes were evaluated. In comparison to the control group, the flap group yielded significantly increased epidermal and dermal volumes (p = 0.03), however, these values were significantly decreased (p = 0.04) in the gavage and intraperitoneal groups. Capillary volumes were significantly decreased in EGCG treatment groups (p < 0.01). Conclusion Our experiment has shown that oral and intraperitoneal administration of EGCG increases the perforator flap viability when compared with controls, while direct injection decreases the viability.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipOndokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine Scientific Research Projects FoundationOndokuz Mayis University [PYO.TIP.1904.13.028]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe grant for the study was granted by the Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine Scientific Research Projects Foundation (grant no. PYO.TIP.1904.13.028).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherThieme Medical Publ Incen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1055/s-0036-1571807en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectperforator flapen_US
dc.subjectepigallocatechin gallateen_US
dc.subjectflap viabilityen_US
dc.subjectEGCGen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Epigallocatechin Gallate on Flap Viability of Rat Perforator Abdominal Flapsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage256en_US
dc.identifier.endpage261en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Reconstructive Microsurgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster