dc.contributor.author | Ural, Cagri | |
dc.contributor.author | Duran, Ibrahim | |
dc.contributor.author | Evmek, Betul | |
dc.contributor.author | Kavut, Idris | |
dc.contributor.author | Cengiz, Seda | |
dc.contributor.author | Yuzbasioglu, Emir | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-21T13:32:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-21T13:32:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1472-6831 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0245-5 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/13238 | |
dc.description | kavut, idris/0000-0003-2033-4676; yuzbasioglu, emir/0000-0001-5348-6954 | en_US |
dc.description | WOS: 000379721400001 | en_US |
dc.description | PubMed: 27418002 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of different surface treatments on light transmission of aesthetic feldspathic ceramics used in CAD-CAM chairside restorations. Methods: Forty eight feldspatic ceramic test specimens were prepared from prefabricated CAD-CAM blocks by using a slow speed diamond saw. Test specimens were prepared and divided into 4 groups (n = 12). In the control group, no surface treatments were applied on the feldspathic ceramic surfaces. In the hydrofluoric acid group, the bonding surfaces of feldspathic ceramics were etched with 9.5 % hydrofluoric acid. In the sandblasting group the feldspathic ceramic surfaces were air-abraded with 30-mu m alumium oxide (Al2O3) particles and Er: YAG laser was used to irradiate the ceramic surfaces. The incident light power given by the LED device and the transmitted light power through each ceramic sample was registered using a digital LED radiometer device. Each polymerization light had a light guide with 8-mm-diameter tips. Light transmission of feldspathic ceramic samples was determined by placing it on the radiometer and irradiating the specimen for 10 s at the highest setting for each light polymerization. All specimens were coated with gold using a sputter coater and examined under a field emission scanning electron microscope. Surface roughness measurement each group were evaluated with 3D optical surface and tactile profilometers. Results: One-way ANOVA test results revealed that both surface conditioning method significantly affect the light transmittance (F:412.437; p < 0.001) and the surface roughness values (F:16.386; p < 0.001). Al2O3 and Er-YAG laser application reduced the light transmission significantly (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The laser and Al2O3 applications reduced the light transmission of 1.5 mm thickness feldspathic ceramic material below the value of 400 mW/cm(2) which is critical limit for safe polymerization. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Bmc | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1186/s12903-016-0245-5 | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | CAD-CAM blocks | en_US |
dc.subject | Feldspathic ceramic | en_US |
dc.subject | Light-transmission | en_US |
dc.subject | Laser treatment | en_US |
dc.title | Light transmittance and surface roughness of a feldspathic ceramic CAD-CAM material as a function of different surface treatments | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | OMÜ | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 17 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Bmc Oral Health | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |