Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorUral, Cagri
dc.contributor.authorDuran, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorEvmek, Betul
dc.contributor.authorKavut, Idris
dc.contributor.authorCengiz, Seda
dc.contributor.authorYuzbasioglu, Emir
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:32:37Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:32:37Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1472-6831
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0245-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/13238
dc.descriptionkavut, idris/0000-0003-2033-4676; yuzbasioglu, emir/0000-0001-5348-6954en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000379721400001en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 27418002en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of different surface treatments on light transmission of aesthetic feldspathic ceramics used in CAD-CAM chairside restorations. Methods: Forty eight feldspatic ceramic test specimens were prepared from prefabricated CAD-CAM blocks by using a slow speed diamond saw. Test specimens were prepared and divided into 4 groups (n = 12). In the control group, no surface treatments were applied on the feldspathic ceramic surfaces. In the hydrofluoric acid group, the bonding surfaces of feldspathic ceramics were etched with 9.5 % hydrofluoric acid. In the sandblasting group the feldspathic ceramic surfaces were air-abraded with 30-mu m alumium oxide (Al2O3) particles and Er: YAG laser was used to irradiate the ceramic surfaces. The incident light power given by the LED device and the transmitted light power through each ceramic sample was registered using a digital LED radiometer device. Each polymerization light had a light guide with 8-mm-diameter tips. Light transmission of feldspathic ceramic samples was determined by placing it on the radiometer and irradiating the specimen for 10 s at the highest setting for each light polymerization. All specimens were coated with gold using a sputter coater and examined under a field emission scanning electron microscope. Surface roughness measurement each group were evaluated with 3D optical surface and tactile profilometers. Results: One-way ANOVA test results revealed that both surface conditioning method significantly affect the light transmittance (F:412.437; p < 0.001) and the surface roughness values (F:16.386; p < 0.001). Al2O3 and Er-YAG laser application reduced the light transmission significantly (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The laser and Al2O3 applications reduced the light transmission of 1.5 mm thickness feldspathic ceramic material below the value of 400 mW/cm(2) which is critical limit for safe polymerization.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBmcen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1186/s12903-016-0245-5en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCAD-CAM blocksen_US
dc.subjectFeldspathic ceramicen_US
dc.subjectLight-transmissionen_US
dc.subjectLaser treatmenten_US
dc.titleLight transmittance and surface roughness of a feldspathic ceramic CAD-CAM material as a function of different surface treatmentsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.relation.journalBmc Oral Healthen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster