dc.contributor.author | Bekci, Tumay | |
dc.contributor.author | Polat, Ahmet Veysel | |
dc.contributor.author | Asian, Kerim | |
dc.contributor.author | Tomak, Leman | |
dc.contributor.author | Bilgici, Meltem Ceyhan | |
dc.contributor.author | Danaci, Murat | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-21T13:32:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-21T13:32:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0899-7071 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1873-4499 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.06.003 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/13160 | |
dc.description | Bekci, Tumay/0000-0002-3147-2786 | en_US |
dc.description | WOS: 000383305400037 | en_US |
dc.description | PubMed: 27348059 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of ovarian torsion. Methods: We retrospectively identified 84 patients with surgically confirmed ovarian torsion. Seventeen patients with unclear ultrasound findings underwent MRI examination with two different magnetic resonance (MR) systems. Results: In ovarian torsion, the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of the torsed ovary was significantly lower than that of the nonaffected ovary in both MR systems (n = 17; 0.898 +/- 0.539 vs. 1.615 +/- 0.469 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s; P<.001). Conclusions: ADC comparisons were useful for detecting ovarian torsion. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Science Inc | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.06.003 | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Apparent diffusion coefficients | en_US |
dc.subject | Diffusion weighted imaging | en_US |
dc.subject | Emergency | en_US |
dc.subject | Magnetic resonance imaging | en_US |
dc.subject | Ovarian torsion | en_US |
dc.title | Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MRI in the diagnosis of ovarian torsion: comparison of torsed and nonaffected ovaries | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | OMÜ | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 40 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 1029 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 1033 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Clinical Imaging | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |