Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorMarois, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorGuengen, Ali Riza
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:31:50Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:31:50Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0306-6150
dc.identifier.issn1743-9361
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1176023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/13009
dc.descriptionGungen, Ali Riza/0000-0002-9176-8300; Marois, Thomas/0000-0003-0057-3987en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000393749800008en_US
dc.description.abstractIn Turkey, three large and decades-old public banks control about a third of the banking sector. These banks were functional to capitalist industrialization in the postwar era and have evolved spontaneously in ways supportive of neoliberalism. These same banks played a key role in stabilizing Turkey amidst the 2008-2009 global crisis. This gives rise to the seeming contradiction of public banks supporting otherwise neoliberal development strategies. The literature around banking and development has largely failed to capture this dynamic, being instead focused on the economics of public versus private banks. As such, the debate has difficulty capturing the multifaceted and conflicting functions of specific banking institutions. By contrast, we suggest that neither private nor public banks are innately superior - rather, it depends. We engage this problematic through the special issue's debate on institutional function and credibility and the case study of Turkey. As Miyamura's article in this volume has made an important contribution to the validation of the Credibility Thesis by zooming in on labor', so will this paper continue the endogenous analysis of the modes of production by focusing on capital', with its particular reference to state-owned banks in Turkey. From a historical materialist framework, therefore, we argue that Turkey's public banks have evolved spontaneously, and often unintentionally so, in ways supportive of capitalist development. Turkey's public banks thus prevail as credible because their institutionalized social content has changed in complex, class-based, and contradictory ways functional to capitalist reproduction. Such credibility is determined not by ownership form nor achieved by intentional, unmediated design, but has evolved historically within different phases of capitalism. Indeed, as financial capitalism intensifies in Turkey, the public banks have become increasingly important to neoliberal reproduction, hence also giving rise to the problem of alternatives.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMunicipal Services Projecten_US
dc.description.sponsorshipA portion of the fieldwork involved was made possible by the Municipal Services Project's (www.municipalservicesproject.org) 'Public banking for public infrastructure and social development' research contract (2013).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1080/03066150.2016.1176023en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectpublic banksen_US
dc.subjectcredibilityen_US
dc.subjectclassen_US
dc.subjectTurkeyen_US
dc.subjectneoliberalismen_US
dc.subjectfinancializationen_US
dc.subjectstate-owned banksen_US
dc.subjectdevelopmenten_US
dc.titleCredibility and class in the evolution of public banks: the case of Turkeyen_US
dc.typereviewen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume43en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1285en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1309en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Peasant Studiesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster