Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorYagmur, Caglayan
dc.contributor.authorAk, Sertac
dc.contributor.authorEngin, Murat Sinan
dc.contributor.authorEvin, Nuh
dc.contributor.authorKelahmetoglu, Osman
dc.contributor.authorAkbas, Hayati
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:26:44Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:26:44Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0364-216X
dc.identifier.issn1432-5241
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0719-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/12611
dc.description37th National Congress of Turkish-Society-of-Plastic-Reconstructive-and-Aesthetic-Surgery -- NOV 04-07, 2015 -- Ankara, TURKEYen_US
dc.descriptionDemir, Ahmet/0000-0002-8820-3122;en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000394430200024en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 28008458en_US
dc.description.abstractOpen and closed approaches for rhinoplasty have individual advantages and disadvantages; however, the resultant columellar scar of the open approach is directly considered as a disadvantage. This study focuses on the columellar scar awareness and its implications on overall satisfaction of the patients after open rhinoplasty. A total of 91 patients who have undergone open rhinoplasty were included in this study. A written questionnaire algorithm consisting of 4 sequential questions was applied. Except for the first question [Do you have any scar(s) caused by any trauma, operation or any other reason on your face?], every question was answered on a scale from 1 to 5. The respondents were given the 25-question "Modified Body Cathexis Scale (MBCS)"and their scars graded using the "Columellar Scar Assessment Scale" (CSAS). The data were statistically interpreted. Of the 91 open rhinoplasty patients, 12 of them responded with a "yes" to the first question reporting their columellar scars. There was no significant difference with regards to patient satisfaction regarding these patients (p > 0.05). However, those who reported the scar yielded a significantly lower MBCS scores. 9 patients declared that they exerted effort to conceal their scars. Those who concealed their scars and those who did not yielded a significant difference in patient satisfaction. The CSAS scores of those who reported the columellar scar were significantly higher than those who did not. Our study suggests that MBSC can be a valuable tool for determining the impact of outcomes from the patient's standpoint, and awareness of the columellar scar is not related to patient satisfaction but with bodily perception.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTurkish Soc Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surgen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s00266-016-0719-5en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectRhinoplastyen_US
dc.subjectOpen approachen_US
dc.subjectColumellar incisionen_US
dc.subjectScaren_US
dc.subjectScar awarenessen_US
dc.subjectPatient satisfactionen_US
dc.titleColumellar Scar Perception in Open Rhinoplasty. Interplay of Scar Awareness, Body Cathexis and Patient Satisfactionen_US
dc.typeconferenceObjecten_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage153en_US
dc.identifier.endpage160en_US
dc.relation.journalAesthetic Plastic Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster