Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKocasarac, Husniye Demirturk
dc.contributor.authorCelenk, Peruze
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:19:16Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:19:16Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn2233-7822
dc.identifier.issn2233-7830
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2017.47.2.99
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/12405
dc.descriptionWOS: 000416318900005en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 28680846en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Erosions and osteophytes are radiographic characteristics that are found in different stages of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) osteoarthritis. This study assessed the effectiveness of digital subtraction radiography (DSR) in diagnosing simulated osteophytes and erosions in the TMJ. Materials and Methods: Five intact, dry human skulls were used to assess the effectiveness of DSR in detecting osteophytes. Four cortical bone chips of varying thicknesses (0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2.0 mm) were placed at the medial, central, and lateral aspects of the condyle anterior surface. Two defects of varying depth (1.0 mm and 1.5 mm) were created on the lateral, central, and medial poles of the condyles of 2 skulls to simulate erosions. Panoramic images of the condyles were acquired before and after artificially creating the changes. Digital subtraction was performed with Emago dental image archiving software. Five observers familiar with the interpretation of TMJ radiographs evaluated the images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the imaging methods. Results: The area under the ROC curve (Az) value for the overall diagnostic accuracy of DSR in detecting osteophytic changes was 0.931. The Az value for the overall diagnostic accuracy of panoramic imaging was 0.695. The accuracy of DSR in detecting erosive changes was 0.854 and 0.696 for panoramic imaging. DSR was remarkably more accurate than panoramic imaging in detecting simulated osteophytic and erosive changes. Conclusion: The accuracy of panoramic imaging in detecting degenerative changes was significantly lower than the accuracy of DSR (P < .05). DSR improved the accuracy of detection using panoramic images.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipProject Management Office of Ondokuz Mayis UniversityOndokuz Mayis University [PYO.DIS.1904.12.016]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was financially supported by the Project Management Office of Ondokuz Mayis University (PYO.DIS.1904.12.016).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKorean Acad Oral & Maxillofacial Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5624/isd.2017.47.2.99en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectSubtraction Techniqueen_US
dc.subjectOsteophyteen_US
dc.subjectRadiography, Panoramicen_US
dc.subjectTemporomandibular Jointen_US
dc.subjectOsteoarthritisen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of digital subtraction radiography in detecting artificially created osteophytes and erosions in the temporomandibular jointen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume47en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage99en_US
dc.identifier.endpage107en_US
dc.relation.journalImaging Science in Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record