Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorPehlivanlar-Kucuk, Mehtap
dc.contributor.authorKucuk, Ahmet O.
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Cagatay E.
dc.contributor.authorEr, Mehmet C.
dc.contributor.authorUlger, Fatma
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:12:46Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:12:46Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1433-6510
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2018.180334
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/11918
dc.descriptionKUCUK, Ahmet Oguzhan/0000-0002-6993-0519; KUCUK, Mehtap PEHLIVANLAR/0000-0003-2247-4074en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000446010500020en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 30274009en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Uric acid is synthesized from xanthine via xanthine oxidase as an end-product of purine metabolism. Uric acid is a major non-enzymatic antioxidant in the blood, and it exerts a protective action on vitamin C. There are a limited number of ICU studies related to uric acid, which is a valuable prognostic biomarker. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of uric acid as a biomarker in predicting the outcomes of critically ill patients. Methods: This prospective, multi-centered cohort study included 128 patients from two different intensive care units who met the study inclusion criteria between May 2017 and October 2017. Study inclusion criteria were first admission to the ICU, age > 18 years, and ICU stay > 24 hours. In each patient, baseline serum uric acid levels were measured after acute interventions, prior to the initiation of the treatment process. Results: When comparing the last uric acid levels of patients, the median last uric acid levels in the non-survival and survival groups were significantly different (p = 0.001). A last uric acid level > 4.5 mg/dL was associated with a 2.638 times higher risk (relative risk) for mortality. According to ROC analysis, a cutoff value of 1.5 for the ratio between the last two uric acid levels had a sensitivity of 0.21 and a specificity of 0.96 for predicting mortality. A 1.5-fold increase in the uric acid level yielded a positive predictive value of 92.6% and a negative predictive value of 65.2% for predicting mortality. The median uric level in the patient subset with ARDS, was significantly higher than those without ARDS (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Results of this study indicate that a time-dependent increase in uric acid levels can be used as an important biomarker for predicting mortality in critically ill patients; further, uric acid levels should possibly be included in the current mortality risk scoring systems. In addition, elevation of uric acid, a simple, inexpensive, and readily available biomarker, may provide guidance in the diagnostic stage and in predicting clinical outcomes of patients with sepsis or ARDS.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherClin Lab Publen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.7754/Clin.Lab.2018.180334en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectARDSen_US
dc.subjectintensive care uniten_US
dc.subjectmortalityen_US
dc.subjectsepsisen_US
dc.subjecturic aciden_US
dc.titleThe Association Between Serum Uric Acid Level and Prognosis in Critically Ill Patients, Uric Acid as a Prognosis Predictoren_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume64en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1491en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1500en_US
dc.relation.journalClinical Laboratoryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster