Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorUsta, Metin
dc.contributor.authorTufan, Mustafa Cagatay
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Gural
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:10:53Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:10:53Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0168-9002
dc.identifier.issn1872-9576
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2018.04.045
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/11527
dc.descriptionBozkurt, Ahmet/0000-0002-3163-0131en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000433206800017en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, we have performed the calculations stopping power, depth dose, and range verification for proton beams using dielectric and Bethe-Bloch theories and FLUKA, Geant4 and MCNPX Monte Carlo codes. In the framework, as analytical studies, Drude model was applied for dielectric theory and effective charge approach with Roothaan-Hartree-Fock charge densities was used in Bethe theory. In the simulations different setup parameters were selected to evaluate the performance of three distinct Monte Carlo codes. The lung and breast tissues were investigated are considered to be related to the most common types of cancer throughout the world. The results were compared with each other and the available data in literature. In addition, the obtained results were verified with prompt gamma range data. In both stopping power values and depth-dose distributions, it was found that the Monte Carlo values give better results compared with the analytical ones while the results that agree best with ICRU data in terms of stopping power are those of the effective charge approach between the analytical methods and of the FLUKA code among the MC packages. In the depth dose distributions of the examined tissues, although the Bragg curves for Monte Carlo almost overlap, the analytical ones show significant deviations that become more pronounce with increasing energy. Verifications with the results of prompt gamma photons were attempted for 100-200 MeV protons which are regarded important for proton therapy. The analytical results are within 2%-5% and the Monte Carlo values are within 0%-2% as compared with those of the prompt gammas.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Bven_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.nima.2018.04.045en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectProton therapyen_US
dc.subjectStopping poweren_US
dc.subjectRangeen_US
dc.subjectDepth-dose distributionen_US
dc.subjectPrompt gammaen_US
dc.titleStopping power and dose calculations with analytical and Monte Carlo methods for protons and prompt gamma range verificationen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume897en_US
dc.identifier.startpage106en_US
dc.identifier.endpage113en_US
dc.relation.journalNuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipmenten_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster