Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKaleli, Necati
dc.contributor.authorUral, Cagri
dc.contributor.authorOzkoylu, Gozde
dc.contributor.authorDuran, Ibrahim
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T12:26:49Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T12:26:49Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0022-3913
dc.identifier.issn1097-6841
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.08.018
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/10820
dc.descriptionWOS: 000469357900009en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 30661880en_US
dc.description.abstractStatement of problem. Laser sintering is commonly used for fabricating metal-ceramic restorations. The layer thickness of the sintering process may affect restoration adaptation. However, limited information is available regarding its impact. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the marginal and internal adaptation of laser-sintered cobalt-chromium single crown frameworks sintered with layer thicknesses of 25 and 50 mu m. Material and methods. Thirty resin dies that represented prepared single molar abutment teeth were prepared by using a 3-dimensional printer and were divided into 3 groups (n=10) according to the method used for fabricating metal frameworks: group C, metal frameworks fabricated by using the lost-wax method (control); group L25, metal frameworks fabricated by using direct metal laser melting with a layer thickness of 251 mu m; and group L50, metal frameworks fabricated by using direct metal laser melting with a layer thickness of 50 mu m. After fabricating the metal frameworks, 15 vertical marginal discrepancy measurements were made in each axial region (mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual) using a stereomicroscope. Next, all the specimens were sectioned from the midline, and 5 internal discrepancy measurements were made in each internal region (inner marginal, axial, and occlusal). The data were analyzed statistically by using 1-way ANOVA, the Tukey honestly significant difference, and Tamhane T2 tests (alpha=.05). Result. The highest marginal and internal discrepancy values were obtained for metal frameworks in group C, and these values were significantly different (P<.001) from those obtained for metal frameworks in the other 2 groups. No significant difference was observed in the marginal and internal discrepancy values of metal frameworks in groups L25 and L50. Conclusion. These results indicate that layer thickness does not affect the adaptation of laser-sintered metal frameworks, yet both sintering parameters yielded significantly lower mean marginal discrepancy values than the cast group.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMosby-Elsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.08.018en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleEffect of layer thickness on the marginal and internal adaptation of laser-sintered metal frameworksen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume121en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage922en_US
dc.identifier.endpage928en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Prosthetic Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster