Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKavaz, Esra
dc.contributor.authorKurnaz, Senem Cengel
dc.contributor.authorGuvenc, Dilek
dc.contributor.authorYarim, Murat
dc.contributor.authorAksoy, Abdurrahman
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T12:26:41Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T12:26:41Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2149-3987
dc.identifier.issn2149-553X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/tao.2019.4164
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/10795
dc.descriptionAksoy, Abdurrahman/0000-0001-9486-312X; KAVAZ, ESRA/0000-0002-6297-6012en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000475757700003en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 31360923en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: If the respiratory nasal mucosa is damaged and the mucosa does not heal properly during nasal or paranasal sinus surgery, a revision surgery may be required. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of oral propolis application on mucosal wound healing following endoscopic nasal surgery in a rabbit model. Methods: Twenty four New Zealand rabbits were randomly divided into three groups, namely the experimental group (EG), the control group (CG), and the negative control group (NCG). Mucosal resection was applied with 3-mm punch forceps in the bilateral ventral nasal concha in the experimental and control groups. 75 mg/kg/day propolis was added to the diet of the rabbits in the EG for 14 days. The CG continued with the standard diet postoperatively. In the NCG, no surgical intervention was made, and no dietary support was given. On postoperative day 14 all rabbits were sacrificed and left nasal specimens were examined histopathologically, hydroxyproline levels were measured in right nasal specimens. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in hydroxyproline level, epithelial and subepithelial thickness, ciliary and goblet cell count, subepithelial fibrosis and collagen density between EG and CG. Neutrophil count was statistically significantly lower in EG, compared to CG (p=0.019, Tamhane test). Conclusion: Although there are many studies that show the positive effects of propolis on wound healing, such effect was not observed in this study. This study is deemed to constitute a unique experimental study that can be a resource for future similar studies to be performed with higher numbers of subjects and higher dosage of propolis.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCommission of Scientific Research Projects of Ondokuz Mayis UniversityOndokuz Mayis University [PYO.TIP.1904.14.013]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the Commission of Scientific Research Projects of Ondokuz Mayis University (Project No: PYO.TIP.1904.14.013).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAvesen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5152/tao.2019.4164en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectEndoscopic nasal surgeryen_US
dc.subjecthydroxyprolineen_US
dc.subjectpropolisen_US
dc.subjectwound healingen_US
dc.titleEffects of Oral Propolis on Mucosal Wound Healing after Endoscopic Nasal Surgery in a Rabbit Modelen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume57en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage68en_US
dc.identifier.endpage74en_US
dc.relation.journalTurkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology-Turk Otorinolarengoloji Arsivien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster