Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAydin, Zeynep Gokce Gayretli
dc.contributor.authorBuyukcam, Ayse
dc.contributor.authorKara, Ates
dc.contributor.authorKarbuz, Adem
dc.contributor.authorSoysal, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorTapisiz, Anil Aktas
dc.contributor.authorErguven, Muferret
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T12:19:31Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T12:19:31Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1307-1068
dc.identifier.issn1308-5271
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5578/ced.68192
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/10421
dc.descriptionWOS: 000510640400001en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: Infection is a common complication in children with malignancies. There is no consistent guidance for environmental infection control and isolation precautions for neutropenic patients (NP). There are differences between centers. The aim of this questionnaire study was to determine these differences in Turkey. Material and Methods: A multicenter-descriptive questionnaire was conducted on 36 centers from different geografical locations of Turkey. Bone marrow transplantation units were excluded. Each center was contacted at least three-times. Questionnaire was answered by two different doctors from each center. Results: Thirty-six centers including 20 (55.5%) University Hospitals, 12 (%33.3) Research Hospitals, three (8.3%) State Hospital and one Private University Hospital participated in this survey. 94.3% of the centers had a bed capacity of 50 beds and over. Twenty-one (58.3%) centers had pediatric infection ward that followed febrile NP. All centers had an infection control committee. 25% (9/36) of the centers always followed pediatric neutropenic fever patients in a single room. 66.6% (24/36) of the centers had toilet in all patients' room. The door features of patients' room included mostly (94.1%, 32/34) manually opened door. Ten (27.7%) centers had hepa filter system, five of them had positive-negative pressure room. Thirteen (38.2%, 13/34) centers prefered hickmann catheter for accessing a patient's central line. Training was given for catheteter care in all centers. Sixteen (44.4%) centers had determined policies about keeping toys in patient rooms. Visitor restrictions were performed in all centers. None of the centers allowed plants or flowers in hospital rooms. There was a neutropenic diet specific for pediatric NP provided in twenty-seven centers (75%). Conclusion: The prevention and control of infection contributes to the improvement of the prognosis of patients with hematological malignancies. Physicians must be aware of the infection risks and take precautions for infectious complications through the neutropenic period and standard protocols should be established and implemented for patients with hematological malignancies.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAves Yayincilik, Ibrahim Karaen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5578/ced.68192en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectNeutropenic patientsen_US
dc.subjectchildrenen_US
dc.subjectinfection controlen_US
dc.titlePediatric Neutropenic Patients Care in Turkeyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpageE141en_US
dc.identifier.endpageE146en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Pediatric Infectionen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster