Publication:
The Comparison of Effectiveness of Alendronate and Risedronate in Osteoporosis Treatment

dc.authorscopusid11140283600
dc.authorscopusid11141111400
dc.authorscopusid6506103281
dc.authorscopusid8432518400
dc.authorscopusid12752758300
dc.authorscopusid6602342527
dc.contributor.authorAkyol, Y.
dc.contributor.authorTander, B.
dc.contributor.authorAlayli, G.
dc.contributor.authorDurmuş, D.
dc.contributor.authorBek, Y.
dc.contributor.authorCantürk, F.
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-10T21:06:44Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.departmentOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesien_US
dc.department-temp[Akyol] Yeşim, Tip Fakultesi, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Tander] Berna, Tip Fakultesi, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Alayli] Gamze, Tip Fakultesi, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Durmuş] Dilek, Tip Fakultesi, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey; [Bek] Yüksel,; [Cantürk] Ferhan, Tip Fakultesi, Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study was performed to compare the effects of once weekly alendronate sodium and once weekly risedronate sodium treatment on bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Materials and Methods: One hundred and twelve patients were included in this study and randomly classified into two groups. Group I (n=60) received alendronate Na (70 mg/week) and group II (n=52) received risedronate Na (35 mg/week). All patients received 1 g calcium per day in addition to these therapies. The study duration was limited to 12 months. Age, body mass index, duration of menopause and age at menarche were recorded. The efficacy of the treatment was evaluated by BMD measurements at lumbar spine and proximal femur at the beginning and 12th months of the treatment. The statistical analyses were done by Shapiro-Wilk test, ANCOVA and Spearman test. Results: The mean age was 56.65±8.25 years in group I and 56.69±7.75 years in the group II. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups (p>0.05). Significant improvement was found at the end of the treatment in groups itself by lumbar spine and proximal femur BMD (Group I: p<0.05, Group II: p<0.05). There was no significant difference between two groups by lumbar spine and proximal femur BMD (p>0.05). Conclusion: Our results suggest that both treatment protocols provide similar efficacy in treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and almost have similar effects in enhancing the BMD.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage114en_US
dc.identifier.issn1302-0234
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33751249901
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage110en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/34475
dc.identifier.volume52en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.relation.ispartofFTR - Turkiye Fiziksel Tip ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAlendronateen_US
dc.subjectOsteoporosisen_US
dc.subjectRisedronateen_US
dc.subjectTreatmenten_US
dc.titleThe Comparison of Effectiveness of Alendronate and Risedronate in Osteoporosis Treatmenten_US
dc.title.alternativeOsteoporoz Tedavisinde Alendronat ve Risedronatın Etkinliklerinin Karşılaştırılmasıen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files