• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Assessment of the optimum section thickness for the estimation of liver volume using magnetic resonance images: A stereological gold standard study

Date

2006

Author

Sahin, B
Ergur, H

Metadata

Show full item record

Abstract

Estimation of liver volume using magnetic resonance (MR) images has been described previously. We have, however, not found a gold standard study, which analyzes the effect of section thickness on the estimation of liver volume. In the present study, five normal cadaveric livers were scanned in the horizontal plane using a 1.5 T MR machine (Signa 1.5T SYS#GEMSOW General Electronic, Wisconsin, USA). Consecutive sections at a thickness of 10, 7.5, 5 and 2.5 mm were used to estimate the total volume of the livers by means of the Cavalieri principle. The point counting and planimetry were used for the volume estimates. With a view to evaluating the accuracy of two techniques, all the estimations were done by the same observer. The estimated volumes concur with the actual volume of the livers obtained by the fluid displacement technique (p > 0.05). However, the section thickness has an over- or under-projection effect on the estimated volume. The obtained volume estimation results were analyzed to reveal the deviation principles of the estimates based on the section thickness. The most suitable section thickness for the liver volume estimation was assessed to be 4-5 mm. There were no significant differences between the estimation results of two methods (p > 0.05). The point-counting technique did, however, take less time than planimetry for estimating liver volume from MR images. Results also showed that the effect of section thickness on volume estimates using the two approaches could not be omitted and the values obtained could be calibrated using the proposed regression formula presented in this study. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Source

European Journal of Radiology

Volume

57

Issue

1

URI

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.07.006
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/20793

Collections

  • PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6144]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [14046]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [12971]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Policy | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Ondokuz Mayıs

by OpenAIRE

Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Google Analytics Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Policy || Library || Ondokuz University || OAI-PMH ||

Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
Ondokuz University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Ondokuz Mayıs:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.