• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Treatment of Long Bone Fractures with Acrylic External Fixation in Dogs and Cats: Retrospective Study in 30 Cases (2006-2008)

Date

2009

Author

Oezak, Ahmet
Yardimci, Cenk
Nisbet, Hatice Oezlem
Sirin, Yusuf Sinan

Metadata

Show full item record

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to assess the use of acrylic external fixation in long bone fractures of dogs and cats. The material of this retrospective study was composed of 22 dogs and 8 cats. Thirty fractures localized in long bones were stabilized using acrylic external fixation with different frame configurations. Configuration of the ESF was unilateral (type I) in 2 (9%), bilateral (type II) in 14 (63.6%). bilateral biplanar (type III) in 3 (13.7%). and free-form in 3 (13.7%) dogs and unilateral (type I) in 2 (25%), and bilateral (type II) in 6 (75%) cats. Mean frame removal duration was 37 days in dogs and 29.5 days in cats. Minor complications like pin tract infection. periosteal reaction, late pin loosening, synostose, and mild interfragmental angulation were observed in 8 cases (26.6%) and major complications like osteomyelitis, nonunion and delayed union in three (10%). One case was euthanasised because of a concomitant vertebral fracture The final outcome at frame removal was judged as excellent in 19 cases (65.6%). good in 7 (24.2%), fair in 1 (3.4%), and poor in 2 (6.8%) Fixator tolerance and bone healing were better in cats and puppies when compared with adult dogs. It was concluded that with a proper frame configuration. acrylic external fixation can maintain effective stabilization in long bone fractures of dogs and cats. Cost-effectiveness is one of the other advantages of this technique.

Source

Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi

Volume

15

Issue

4

URI

https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/18981

Collections

  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [14046]
  • TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [4706]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [12971]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Policy | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Ondokuz Mayıs

by OpenAIRE

Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Google Analytics Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Policy || Library || Ondokuz University || OAI-PMH ||

Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
Ondokuz University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Ondokuz Mayıs:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.