• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Proshield (R) (Organosilane Quaternary Amine) Coated Silicone Catheters: Do They Have Any Effect on Bacterial Colonisation and Tissue Histopathology?

Date

2011

Author

Gunaydin, Mithat
Rizalar, Riza
Gunaydin, Murat
Yildiz, Levent
Bilgin, Kemal
Tander, Burak
Bernay, Ferit

Metadata

Show full item record

Abstract

Objective: Catheter-related infections are serious problems in current surgical practice. New coating materials have been produced to eliminate the infections. We aimed to evaluate the antiinfectious effects of Proshield (R) "organosilane quaternary amine" (Nano Technology Marketing Company -Istanbul) coated catheters. Material and Methods: Twenty one Sprague-Dawley rats were equally divided into three groups. In all rats, one Proshield coated and one non-coated catheter were placed in the same space. In group A, the catheters were put in the abdomen, in group B into the bladder and in group C in the subcutaneous space. In all rats, cultured 106 cfu/ml bacteria were given to same place with the catheters (S.aureus into abdomen and subcutaneous tissue, E. coli into bladder). Fifteen days after surgery, the catheters were removed, microbiologic and histopathologic analyses were made. Results: In both proshield coated and non-coated catheters, similar histopathologic findings were obtained. In all groups, proshield coated catheters had less colonization compared to non-coated catheters, but the difference was not significant (p>0.05). Conclusion: Antiseptic or antibiotic-soaked catheters are products to avoid infections proven by many studies and have decreased bacterial colonization rates compared to the standard non-coated catheters. Likewise, Proshield coated catheters may also be beneficial against bacterial colonization, but new technologies are required to produce more effective catheters.

Source

Turkiye Klinikleri Tip Bilimleri Dergisi

Volume

31

Issue

6

URI

https://doi.org/10.5336/medsci.2010-21831
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/16907

Collections

  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [14046]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [12971]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Policy | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Ondokuz Mayıs

by OpenAIRE

Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Google Analytics Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Policy || Library || Ondokuz University || OAI-PMH ||

Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
Ondokuz University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Ondokuz Mayıs:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.