• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry

Date

2019

Author

Can, Ertugrul
Eser-Ozturk, Hilal
Duran, Mustafa
Cetinkaya, Tugba
Ariturk, Nursen
Article has an altmetric score of 7

See more details

Picked up by 1 news outlets
15 readers on Mendeley

Metadata

Show full item record

Abstract

To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained by the AL-Scan, Lenstar LS900, Galilei, and ultrasound pachymetry (UP) in normal and cataractous eyes. Methods: Eighty eyes of healthy subjects were included in the study. Each subject was assessed by four different methods of measurements using the AL-Scan, Lenstar LS900, Galilei, and UP by a single examiner. To assess the intraobserver repeatability, three consecutive measurements were taken for the AL-Scan. Results: The mean CCT [+/- standard deviation (SD)] for the AL-Scan, Lenstar LS900, Galilei, and UP were 554.6 +/- 30.9 mu m, 542.9 +/- 31.3 mu m, 570.7 +/- 30 mu m, and 552.7 +/- 32.8 mu m, respectively. The differences between pairs of mean CCT for the methods are statistically significant for the pairs of Galilei-UP, AL-Scan-Galilei, and Lenstar LS900-Galilei. Bland-Altman plots showed that AL-Scan-UP have the closest agreement, followed by Lenstar-UP and AL-Scan-Lenstar. Galilei was found to have the poorest agreement with the other three methods. The intraobserver repeatability of the AL-Scan was very good with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.980. Conclusion: We found that CCT measurements between the AL-Scan-UP, Lenstar LS900-UP, and AL-Scan-Lenstar LS900 showed very strong correlation and comparable agreement. AL-Scan-UP showed the closest agreement and these devices can be used interchangeably in clinical practice. Galilei significantly showed higher value of CCT compared to other methods. It was also observed that the Al-Scan had excellent intraobserver repeatability.

Source

Indian Journal of Ophthalmology

Volume

67

Issue

4

URI

https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_960_18
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/10912

Collections

  • PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6144]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [14046]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [12971]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Policy | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Ondokuz Mayıs

by OpenAIRE

Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Google Analytics Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Policy || Library || Ondokuz University || OAI-PMH ||

Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
Ondokuz University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Ondokuz Mayıs:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.